透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.16.218.62
  • 期刊

全民健保腹膜透析比血液透析省錢嗎?

Is Peritoneal Dialysis Cheaper than Hemodialysis under National Health Insurance?

摘要


Objectives: To compare utilization of National Health Insurance (NHI) resources in terms of health expenses, including dialysis- and non-dialysis-related expenses, between hemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients. This study also analyzed the influence of different variables, such as gender, age, and disease severity, to two modalities of dialysis. Methods: This study was a retrospective study of new dialyzed patients and their health expenses between 2003 and 2005. Data were abstracted and analyzed from the inpatient/outpatient claim databases of the NHI for 30 consecutive months. Results: Two thousand four hundred seven patients were included in this study; 1,069 (44.4%) were males and 1,338 (55.6%) were females. Two thousand one hundred eighty-nine patients (90.94%) were classified as the ”HD” group and two hundred eighteen patients (9.06%) were classified as the ”PD” group. Most patients belonged to the 45-64 age group (46.28% of the total sample). The average Charlson Index was 5.06. The average individual outpatient dialysis expense in the PD group was NT$459,843/year and NT$618,306/year for the HD group. The average individual outpatient non-dialysis expense in the PD group was NT$47,388/year and NT$45,761/year for the HD group. The average individual inpatient dialysis expense in the PD group was NT$9,504/year and NT$18,981/year for the HD group. The average individual inpatient non-dialysis expense in the PD group was NT$ 37,531/year and NT$40,712/year for the HD group. Conclusions: The individual outpatient and inpatient dialysisrelated expenses of the PD group were significantly less expensive than the HD group (p<0.001). However, PD patients were younger and had milder disease severity than the HD patients. There were no significant differences in outpatient and inpatient No-ndialysis-related expenses between the PD and HD groups.

並列摘要


Objectives: To compare utilization of National Health Insurance (NHI) resources in terms of health expenses, including dialysis- and non-dialysis-related expenses, between hemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients. This study also analyzed the influence of different variables, such as gender, age, and disease severity, to two modalities of dialysis. Methods: This study was a retrospective study of new dialyzed patients and their health expenses between 2003 and 2005. Data were abstracted and analyzed from the inpatient/outpatient claim databases of the NHI for 30 consecutive months. Results: Two thousand four hundred seven patients were included in this study; 1,069 (44.4%) were males and 1,338 (55.6%) were females. Two thousand one hundred eighty-nine patients (90.94%) were classified as the ”HD” group and two hundred eighteen patients (9.06%) were classified as the ”PD” group. Most patients belonged to the 45-64 age group (46.28% of the total sample). The average Charlson Index was 5.06. The average individual outpatient dialysis expense in the PD group was NT$459,843/year and NT$618,306/year for the HD group. The average individual outpatient non-dialysis expense in the PD group was NT$47,388/year and NT$45,761/year for the HD group. The average individual inpatient dialysis expense in the PD group was NT$9,504/year and NT$18,981/year for the HD group. The average individual inpatient non-dialysis expense in the PD group was NT$ 37,531/year and NT$40,712/year for the HD group. Conclusions: The individual outpatient and inpatient dialysisrelated expenses of the PD group were significantly less expensive than the HD group (p<0.001). However, PD patients were younger and had milder disease severity than the HD patients. There were no significant differences in outpatient and inpatient No-ndialysis-related expenses between the PD and HD groups.

參考文獻


Alloatti S,Manes M,Paternoster G,Gaiter AM,Molino A,Rosati C.(2000).Peritonal dialysis compared with hemodialysis in the treatment of end-stage renal disease.J Nephrol.13,331-342.
Bruns FJ,Seddon P,Saul M,Zeidel ML.(1998).The cost of caring for end-stage kidney disease patients: an analysis based on hospital financial transaction records.J Am Soc Nephrol.9,884-890.
Collins AJ,Kasiske B,Herzog C(2007).USRDS(The United States Renal Data System) 2006 ADR: international comparisons.Am J Kidney Dis.49,223-234.
Hooi LS,Lim TO,Goh A(2005).Economic evaluation of centre haemodialysis and continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis in Ministry of Health hospitals, Malaysia.Nephrol.10,25-32.
Kalo Z,Jaray J,Nagy J.(2001).Economic evaluation of kidney transplantation versus hemodialysis in patients with end-stage renal disease in Hungary.Prog Transplant.11,188-193.

被引用紀錄


李佩珍(2012)。透析給付方式認知影響透析醫護人員處方行為之研究〔碩士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2012.01110
廖秋萍(2010)。腹膜透析病患治療成效之相關因素探討〔碩士論文,臺北醫學大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6831/TMU.2010.00146
蔡秉諺(2010)。台灣慢性腎臟疾病患者盛行率與醫療利用分析-以健保資料庫為例〔碩士論文,臺北醫學大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6831/TMU.2010.00013
賴碧蓉(2013)。透析支付政策改變與腹膜透析短期技術失敗相關之探討〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2013.10270
謝其政(2011)。台灣末期腎臟病患血液透析與腹膜透析成本效果分析〔博士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2011.10471

延伸閱讀