透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.149.252.37
  • 期刊

IPO詢價圈購之承銷商配售行為

Allocations in IPO Bookbuilding

摘要


我國自民國93年開始,IPO案件主要以詢價圈購的方式進行。詢價圈購與競價拍賣及公開申購的最大差異在於承銷商具有股票分配的裁量權,而究竟承銷商是如何運用此裁量權目前的實證證據相當有限。本研究採用民國93年5月至民國96年5月,共計69家採詢價圈購承銷之台灣IPO公司為樣本,運用各樣本公司的逐筆圈購與配售資料,探討承銷商的配售行為並驗證詢價圈購的相關理論。實證結果顯示,限價圈購單獲得顯著較高的分配與圈購獲利,符合詢價圈購的資訊取得理論;此外,承銷商的分配相當重視股權分散的考量,小額圈購單獲得較多的分配與獲利;在對機構投資人及自然人的分配行為部份,機構投資人獲得較高的分配但卻未有顯著較高的獲利,符合承銷風險的保險假說,而機構投資人與自然人在限價圈購單及大額圈購單的配售敏感度並無顯著差異;最後,承銷商的分配裁量權會隨著超額認購情形的上升而增加。

並列摘要


In Taiwan, it has become a common practice since 2004 that IPO shares are sold mainly through bookbuilding. The key distinguishing feature of IPOs conducted by bookbuilding, as opposed to auctions or public offers, is that the underwriters have discretion over who receives allocations. However, there remains very limit evidences on how this discretion is exercised. In this paper, we study a unique data set that comprises the books of 69 IPO's bookbuilding issues in Taiwan between May 2004 and May 2007, to investigate the allocation decision of the underwriters and tests theories about bookbuilding. Empirical results indicate that underwriters favor limit bids by giving larger allocations and profits. This finding is consistent with the information extraction theories. The underwriters also favor small bids, which indicate the underwriters being concerned about control issues. Institutional investors are favored with larger allocations, but their profits do not seem to be higher than other investors'. This finding supports the hypothesis that the underwriter uses his discretion to reward investors who act as a form of insurance by buying shares both in good and bad issues. In addition, the rationing sensitivities of limit bids and large bids are not significantly different for institutional and retail investors. Finally, the discretion is larger when IPOs is heavily oversubscribed.

參考文獻


陳安琳、李文智、林宗源(1999),「新上市公司股票之發行折價-代理成本與公司控制之研究」,《中國財務學刊》,第6卷第3期,1-23。
馬黛、胡德中(2003),「承銷配售機制之決定及其對IPO折價之影響:競價拍賣、詢價圈購與公開申購」,《財務金融學刊》,第11卷第1期,1-40。
Aggarwal, R. (2003), “Allocation of Initial Public Offerings and Flipping Activity,” Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 68, No. 1, 111-135.
Barber, B. M., Y. T. Lee, Y. J. Liu and T. Odean (2009), “Just How Much Do Individual Investors Lose by Trading?,” Review of Financial Studies, Vol. 22, No. 2, 609-632.
Benveniste, L.M. and P.A. Spindt (1989), “How Investment Bankers Determine the Offer Price and Allocation of New Issues,” Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 24, No. 2, 343-361.

被引用紀錄


李芸蓁(2017)。台灣初次上市(櫃)股票承銷制度變革之探討〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU201703021
許志宏(2015)。投資人參與初次上市(櫃)詢價圈購影響因素之研究〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2015.00839
藍立章(2015)。以詢價圈購方式辦理初次上市(櫃) 之承銷商訂價效率性研究〔碩士論文,國立中正大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0033-2110201614020970
陳彥良(2016)。IPO之承銷商配售行為與報酬率、後市流動性的關聯性〔碩士論文,國立臺中科技大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0061-0308201616203100

延伸閱讀