透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.226.251.22
  • 期刊

Prognostic Value of Chemo-Naïve Serum Carcinoembryonic Antigen Level in Patients with Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

血清癌胚抗原在未接受化學治療的非小細胞肺癌患者之預測價值

摘要


背景:癌胚抗原(CEA)是一個已知的非小細胞肺癌(NSCLC)的標記。而在一些針對非小細胞肺癌患者中的小樣本研究中發現,癌胚抗原是這些患者死亡率和預後不良的一個危險因素。本研究目的是評估血清癌胚抗原值,在不同腫瘤分期且未接受化學治療,且較大樣本數的非小細胞肺癌患者中之預測價值。方法:251位患有第2期至第4期非小細胞肺癌者,其血清癌胚抗原值在接受化療前接受測量。之後251位患者於2008/01 to 2011/12期間,在高雄長庚紀念醫院接受cisplatin and gemcitabine的第一線化學治療。這些病人被分為兩組:一組其血清癌胚抗原值在接受化療前大於等於40 ng/mL,另一組血清癌胚抗原值小於40 ng/mL。我們分析此兩組病人在臨床特徵,總生存率,以及2年死亡率之差異。另外,我們也檢視血清癌胚抗原值與癌症轉移部位之關聯性。結果:在251個患者中,183位(72.9%)其血清癌胚抗原值小於40 ng/mL,68位(27.1%)血清癌胚抗原值大於等於40 ng/mL。單變項分析發現肺腺癌(p=0.014),後期肺癌(p=0.007),以及癌細胞轉移(p=0.037)與血清癌胚抗原值大於或於40 ng/mL有關。Cox多變項回歸分析結果顯示病人體能狀態,癌症分期,以及患者年齡大於等於70歲為非小細胞肺癌患者死亡的獨立預測因子。血清癌胚抗原值並非患者死亡與否的預測因子,也無法預測IIIb期患者之後癌症轉移部位。結論:在此研究中,血清癌胚抗原不是非小細胞肺癌患者死亡的預測因子。

並列摘要


Background: Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) is a known marker for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and was suggested as a risk factor for mortality and poor prognosis in some studies of a small sample size involving patients in early and advanced stages of NSCLC. The aim of this study was to assess the prognostic value of the serum CEA level in a larger chemo-naïve patient population with NSCLC of different stages. Methods: Two hundred fifty-one (251) patients with stage II to IV NSCLC had their serum CEA measured before chemotherapy, and then received cisplatin and gemcitabine as first-line chemotherapy at Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital from 2008/01 to 2011/12. Patients were subdivided into 2 groups: pre-chemotherapy serum CEA level ≥40 ng/ml and <40 ng/ml. We analyzed the difference in clinical characteristics, overall survival, and 2-year mortality between the 2 groups. We also examined the association between the serum CEA level and the sites of metastasis. Results: Of the 251 patients with NSCLC, 183 (72.9%) had a serum CEA level <40 ng/mL and 68 (27.1%) had a CEA level ≥40 ng/mL. Univariate analysis showed adenocarcinoma (p=0.014), advanced staging (p=0.007), and metastasis (p=0.037) were associated with CEA ≥40 ng/ml. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that performance status (AHR 3.49; 95% CI, 1.81-6.72; p=0.000), staging (AHR 5.37; 95% CI, 1.94-14.82; p=0.001) and age ≥70 (AHR 1.84; 95% CI, 1.02-3.24; p=0.044) were prognostic factors for mortality in patients with NSCLC. The serum CEA level was not a prognostic factor for mortality, nor did it predict the site of metastasis in patients with stage IIIb NSCLC. Conclusions: Serum CEA level was not a prognostic factor for mortality in patients with NSCLC in our study.

延伸閱讀