高中學校本位體育課程發展評鑑指標之建構

Construction of Evaluation Indicators for School-Based Physical Education Curriculum Development in Senior High Schools

潘義祥(Yi-Hsiang Pan)

《體育學報》 44卷4期 (2011/12) Pp. 571-591

https://doi.org/10.6222/pej.4404.201112.0906

摘要

目的：因應普通高級中學體育課程綱要之實施，建構學校本位體育課程發展評鑑指標，以作為高中學校本位體育課程發展評估之依據。方法：本研究採用焦點團體訪談與德懷術等方法，焦點團體訪談共有40位學者專家，分成3個小組，歷經3次座談；德懷術共計19位學者專家，歷經3次問卷調查。結果：研究結果顯示高中學校本位體育課程發展評鑑指標共含4個一級指標、14個二級指標、55個三級指標，一級指標分成課程籌畫、課程設計、課程實施、課程評鑑4個構面。課程籌畫構面包含組織建置與運作、背景分析與需求評估、體育課程願景與特色等3個二級指標；課程設計構面包含體育課程目標、體育課程架構、體育課程內容、體育學習評量等4個二級指標；課程實施構面包含課程實施前的準備、體育教學活動的實施、學習評量的執行、課程實施的因應等4個二級指標。課程評鑑包含學生學習成效、課程滿意程度、評鑑結果與回饋利用等3個二級指標。結論：本研究所建構的高中學校本位體育課程發展評鑑指標，是具有內在品質的評鑑工具，可做為高中學校本位體育課程發展評估之用。

關鍵字

德懷術 ； 課程革新 ； 教育指標

並列摘要

Purpose: To construct a set of evaluation indicators for school-based physical education curriculum development in senior high schools (EI-SBPECDSHS). Methods: The construction of the EI-SBPECDSHS was informed by focus group interviews and the Delphi technique. 40 physical education scholars and experts were assigned into 3 groups in the first stage and subsequently went through three focus group discussion sessions to form the preliminary EI-SBPECDSHS. The second stage involved 19 physical education scholars and experts who employed the Delphi technique to construct the final EI-SBPECDSHS. Results: The results indicated that EI-SBPECDSHS included 4 first-level indicators, 14 second-level indicators and 55 third-level indicators. The first-level indicators were classified into curriculum preparation, curriculum design, curriculum implementation, and curriculum evaluation. The curriculum preparation dimension contained 3 second-level indicators which included organization establishment and operation, background analysis and requirement estimation, physical education curriculum vision and feature. This curriculum design dimension contained physical education curriculum objective, physical education curriculum framework, physical education curriculum content, and learning assessment. The curriculum implementation dimension contained 4 second-level indicators including teaching preparation, implementation of teaching, implementation of assessment, and response of curriculum implementation. The curriculum evaluation dimension contained 3 second-level indicators including learning effect, curriculum satisfaction, evaluative result and feedback application. Conclusion: The EI-SBPECDSHS is a good evaluation tool, it could be used on analyzing the school-based physical education curriculum development in senior high schools.

並列關鍵字

Delphi technique ； curriculum innovation ； educational indicators

參考文獻

甄曉蘭、鐘靜(2002)。學校本位課程發展相關問題及其相應措施之研究。師大學報。47(1)，1-16。

潘義祥(2010)。高中體育教師專業指標之建構與驗證。大專體育學刊。12(3)，11-23。

楊宗文、邱金松(2007)。體育後設評鑑標準之建構。大專體育學刊。9(4)，99-112。

游家政(2008)。學校本位課程評鑑的回顧與展望。課程與教學季刊。12(1)，25-48。

歐用生(2008)。學校本位課程評鑑的視野—雲林縣學校優質轉型經驗的省思。課程與教學季刊。12(1)，1-24。