透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.133.119.66
  • 期刊

台灣結、中國結與台灣心、中國情:台灣選舉中的符號政治

Taiwan-China Complex and Taiwan-China Concern: Symbolic Politics in Taiwan' s Elections

摘要


本文將集體層次上「中國結與台灣結」的文化叢結概念,落實在個體層次的「中國情與台灣心」價值信念上分析,並與其他相關的政治心理變項,來說明台灣選舉中的所謂「符號政治」。以1998年與2001年兩次立委選舉的調查資料為基礎,分析結果發現:選民的「台灣心-中國情」之價值信念,可以有效地在經驗上掌握到「台灣結」與「中國結」集體潛意識的政治心理特徵;此外,選民的「中國情」與「台灣心」的心理,不僅是直接與間接影響選民黨派投票抉譯的因素,也是各種可視為構成「中國結」與「台灣結」組成因素的主軸。本文分析指出,台灣選舉的符號政治,主要是表現在「中國結」與「台灣結」衍生的對立性政治情感上;這兩種「原鄉」集體潛意識的文化叢結,在選舉競爭過程中,被轉化與極化成為對立的政治情緒。分析結果也發現,影響選民黨派投票抉擇的因素,如省籍、族群認同、政黨認同與統獨議題立場等,都輻輳交疊在「中國情與台灣心」為主軸的價值信念上。本文以因素分析來呈現這些變項的交集點,並從它們的共同因素基礎上,賦予政治上所謂的「中國結」與「台灣結」的經驗內涵。

並列摘要


“Taiwan vs. China” complex has been taken as the major factor that draws partisan line between parties along the “Taiwan-independence and China-unification” stance on the one hand and influences vote-choice among Taiwanese and Mainlanders on the other. Yet, this linkage has not been explored empirically as far. According to symbolic politics theory, Taiwanese vote-choices are influenced more by political affect than self-interest. The paper argues that those political affect components, as shown either in determining individual’s vote-choices or in party’s strategy of electoral mobilization, can be effectively channeled down to this “Taiwan vs. China” complex. The paper recasts this culturally deep-seated concept by looking at its derivative psycho-political orientations, so-called “Taiwan vs. China” concern, which is measured by a cluster of affective-driven beliefs in Taiwan’s supremacy and/or concerns for China. Based on an analysis of post-electoral survey data of the 1998 and 2001 legislative elections, two-factor structure is found in the “Taiwan vs. China” concerns, and this polarized affect orientation serves as a link to relate socio-demographic characteristics to ethnic identification, national identity, party identification, independence-unification stance as well as to partisan vote-choice. Symbolic politics in Taiwan’s election is thus confirmed by individual’s affect-driven vote-choices. In sum, the paper concludes that the empirical import of “Taiwan-China complex” concept can be identified as two groups of political affect components around “Taiwan vs. China” concerns in a two second-order factor analysis.

參考文獻


Berelson, Bernard R.(1952).Democratic Theory and Public Opinion.Public Opinion Quarterly.16,313-330.
Jung, Carl G.(1960).A Review of the Complex Thoery.(Edited and translated, Hull).
Jung, Carl G.(1969).The Concept of the Collective Uncounscious.Edited and translated, Hull.9
Jung, Carl G.(1971).A Psychological Theory of Types.(In Psychological Types).

被引用紀錄


吳靜儒(2016)。為何支持太陽花學運?政黨認同或議題瞭解〔碩士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2016.00114
曲孟宣(2006)。台灣政治發展與美中台互動研究-以台灣第十一任總統大選及其影響為例〔碩士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2006.00829
張志豪(2017)。大陸政策與國家利益:李扁馬執政時期的比較(1988-2013)〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU201700257
束沐(2016)。「自主提升」與「偏好分歧」:國家中心論視角下馬政府兩岸政策之研究(2008.5~2016.1)〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU201600271
沈景愷(2015)。臺灣人認同與選民的投票抉擇:2000至2012年總統選舉的實證分析〔博士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2015.02236

延伸閱讀