Faculty and Student Attitudes toward Student Ratings of Instruction

台灣地區師范學院師生對“學生評鑒教師教學”態度之研究

張德勝(Te-Sheng Chang)

《花蓮師院學報》 11期 (2000/12) Pp. 37-54

摘要

本研究主要的目的是探討台灣地區九所師範學院教師與學生對「學生評鑑教師教學」的態度，並進而比較師生對此制度看法的差異性。本研究以八十七學年度第二學期專任教師及在籍的學生爲研究對象，共得有效樣本教師部份是456位，學生部份則爲954位。研究工具爲研究者自編的「師範學院師生對『學生評鑑教師教學』態度調查問卷」。研究結果如下：
教師與學生都同意學校實施「學生評鑑教師教學」制度，但是學生的同意度顯著高於教師的同意度。
學生比教師更同意將評鑑結果用於教師的人事決策及學生選課方面。
教師與學生都認爲教師的幽默感、科目的難度以及學生對科目的興趣會影響評鑑的結果。
教師認爲「學生評鑑教師教學」結果不應該公佈在學校的刊物上；學生則持中立意見。
學生認爲教師的等級、學位、性別和擁有國外求學經驗，不會影響評鑑結果；教師則持中立意見。
有關評鑑的實施技術方面，教師和學生都認爲所有任課教師都應該接受評鑑。評鑑者則由正在修課的學生擔任。教師評鑑委員會應該負起評鑑工具編製的責任，且評鑑工具應以各系所統一爲原則。評鑑的實施則以期末在教室內由班級代表主持爲宜。

關鍵字

學生評鑒教師教學 ； 大學教師評鑒 ； 大學教學 ； 師範學院

並列摘要

The purpose of this study was to investigate faculty and student attitudes toward student ratings of instruction. The sample included 456 faculty members and 954students in teachers colleges in the 1999 spring semester. Results indicated the following: (1)Both faculty and students agree with the use of written student ratings of instruction in teachers colleges. However, students are more positive about this evaluation system than faculty. (2)Students have more positive attitudes toward application and usage of student ratings in faculty personnel decision and student course selection than faculty. (3)Both faculty and students agree that instructor humor, course difficulty, student interest toward subject and instructor presence in classroom can affect student ratings. (4)Faculty members have a great deal of resistance to student ratings only if the results are shown in school publication. Student do not think teacher rank, degree, gender, and experience of study abroad affect student ratings. (5)Faculty and students agree that all instructors should accept the student ratings, that current students should be the raters, that a faculty evaluation committee should be responsible for developing the evaluation form, that a department-wide evaluation form should be used for student ratings, that the best time to implement student ratings is at the end of the semester, that the evaluation process may take place in the classroom, and that the classroom chairman should be the person to take charge of the evaluation.

並列關鍵字

Student Rathings ； Faculty Evaluation ； College Teaching ； Teachers College