透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.116.37.228
  • 期刊

台灣反對運動的共識動員:一九七九至一九八九年兩次挑戰高峰的比較

Consensus Mobilization of the Political Opposition in Taiwan: Comparing Two Waves of Challenges, 1979 - 1989

並列摘要


Previous explanations of the rapid development of the political opposition in Taiwan after 1986, when the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) announce its establishment, tend to focus on the process of "political elite interactions" between the Kuomintang (KMT) and its challengers. The role of the change of popular support for the opposition were largely ignored. This paper addresses to the issue of why and how the DPP gains more popular support to launch a successful challenge after 1986 by comparing the ideology and the strategy of consensus mobilization utilized during the two waves of challenges in 1979 and 1986 - 9 respectively. The determinants of consensus mobilization this paper points out include: the degree of resonance between the opposition ideology and the life experiences and/or social memory of its potentiNl supporters; timely occurrences of incidents that coinciding with the opposition ideology; the existence of opposition organizations; and the strategy of transmitting opposition ideology to its potential supporters. The 1979 opposition insurgency, whose primary goals were democratization of Taiwan, lead to a major setback when it met with severe repression in the "Kaohsiung Incident" at the year end. The radicalization of opposition ideology in the 1980s, which is marked by a set of new claims based on "Taiwanese Nationalism," instead of mere "democratization" in the previous era, along with the existence of an opposition organizational network, and the adaption of the mass movement strategy, are considered to be the major factors that distinguished its success from the 1979 insurgency. Ironically, the radicalization of the opposition challenge in terms of ideology and strategy, though consciously resisted by the opposition leaders before the 1980s, were fueled by the KMT I S constant repression against the opposition, and further fertilized by the disadvantageous political power structure against native Taiwanese based on a set of "Chinese Nationalist Ideology," which gradually lost its power of appeal and legitimacy in the 1980s.

被引用紀錄


黃瀅潔(2010)。台灣身心障礙者人權運動議程建構之研究〔碩士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2010.00428
吳沛憶 (2013). 挑戰發展主義霸權:國光石化爭議研究 [master's thesis, National Tsing Hua University]. Airiti Library. https://doi.org/10.6843/NTHU.2013.00613
林美珍(2012)。「台語社」在戰後台語運動的位置與成就〔碩士論文,國立清華大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6843/NTHU.2012.00020
李立偉(2010)。台灣民族認同的日常形構:以中國商品的治理與反消費為例〔碩士論文,國立清華大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6843/NTHU.2010.00666
邱聖雯(2017)。社群媒體與選舉:以2014年臺北市長選舉為例〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU201703172

延伸閱讀