理念在公共政策中的角色及其內容與變遷：以台灣社會對毒品施用者的處置為例

The Content and Role of the Idea in The Making of Policy: The Case of the Policy on Drug Users in Taiwan

劉名峰(Ming-Feng Liu)

《台灣政治學刊》 25卷1期 (2021/06) Pp. 151-199

https://doi.org/10.6683/TPSR.202106_25(1).0004

摘要

本研究試圖透過理念來了解公共政策與其所在之社會間的關係，而此一關係在轉型期裡又特別重要，因為這是個結構及理念同時發生重大變遷的歷史時刻。因此，掌握兩者間的同源性可說是政策研究之理論與實務面的核心課題。文章以台灣歷史上對毒品施用者的政策，及其間多次的轉變作為研究的對象，除了藉著毒品施用者特別邊陲的位置，而在減少主流社會之權力與利益的介入之際，突顯理念的地位之外，也透過數度的轉型與政策的變遷，歸納出台灣社會的特殊性。不同於「政策典範」的概念僅涉及政策理念的形式，本文由文明化歷程所發展的架構，還指出了政策理念的實質內容。首先，文中透過「個人—社群」及「吸納—排除」兩軸，對毒品施用者的處置提出四種政策理念，即大監禁、威嚇、減害與和解；其次，參照著國際政經體制而帶出了此間政策理念的一般路徑，並串連出政策理念與政治社會脈絡間的同源性；最後，透過對台灣歷史上對毒品施用者的政策，本文不僅指出其間政策理念的內容與變遷的路徑，也說明了「政治優位」是台灣社會的特質。尤有進者，此一不同於一般路徑的特質，除了得以反思國際政經體制的西方中心之外，台灣的個案還更具代表性地表現出非西方國家的普遍性，並認為在當下轉型的情境裡，政策研究需要更多地將「政治帶進來（bringing the politics back in）」。

關鍵字

政策理念 ； 毒品施用者 ； 文明化歷程 ； 政治優位 ； 比較政策

並列摘要

The paper aims to explore the structural homology between policy ideas and their respective socioeconomic background, which has played an important role, par excellence, in the age of transition. In this regard, it studies the policy regarding drug users in Taiwan from its very beginning until now, within which there are three principal periods: the Qing dynasty and Japanese colonial period, the authoritarian period, and the period after democratization. Based on the Eliasian perspective on configurational sociology and the civilizing process, four idea-types of policy idea are elaborated: great confinement, intimidation, harm reduction, and reconciliation. Besides, based on the changes in the international regime of political economy, this paper presents a trajectory of policy ideas about drug users in general, and compares this with the case of Taiwan with political preponderance, not only because of the geopolitical tension between the Qing dynasty and Japanese empire, and Communist and Nationalist China, but also due to the political struggle between the KMT and DPP. While the first two periods emphasize the role of nation-state building, the last one focuses on human rights. In this regard, this research not only presents a reflexive stand vis-à-vis the Western-centred civilizing process, but also explains the reason why the case of Taiwan is more likely to represent the general elements for non-Western countries. As such, this study concludes that it is necessary to bring politics back into the realm of policy research.

並列關鍵字

Policy Idea ； Drug User ； Civilizing Process ； Political Preponderance ； Comparative Public Policy

參考文獻

劉名峰，2009，〈台灣民主轉型前後對正當性的認知及其變遷：以龍應台作品中對「中國—台灣」之象徵形式的再現為例（1983-2006）〉，《台灣政治學刊》，13（1）：225-268。Liu, Ming-feng. 2009. “Taiwan minzhu zhuanxing qianhou dui zhengdangxing de renzhi ji qi bianqian: yi Long ying-tai zuopin zhong dui Zhongguo Taiwan zhi xiangzheng xingshi de zaixian weili (1983-2006)” [The Perception of Legitimacy and Its Changes during Taiwan’s Democratic Transition: Imagining China and Taiwan in Lung Ying-Tai’s Narrative, 1983-2006]. The Taiwanese Political Science Review 13 (1): 225-268.

劉名峰，2020，〈評《交互比較視野下的現代性—從台灣出發的反省》〉，《台灣社會學》，39：245-254。Liu, Ming-feng. 2020. “Ping jiaohu bijiao shiye xia de xiandaixing: Cong Taiwan chufa de fanxing” [Book Review: Modernity in Reciprocal Comparison: A Taiwanese Perspective]. Taiwanese Sociology 39: 245-254.

劉明修，2008，《台灣統治與鴉片問題》，李明峻譯，台北：前衛出版社。譯自『台湾統治と阿片問題』，1983。Liu, Ming-xiu. 2008. Taiwan tongzhi yu yapian wenti. [The governance of Taiwan and the opium issue]. Li, Ming-juinn, trans. Taipei: Avant-guard Press. Translated from『台湾統治と阿片問題』. 1983.

劉紹華，2010，〈從珍品到毒品－鴉片類物質的道德經濟學〉，《中國飲食文化》， 6（1）：27-61。Liu, Shaohua. 2010. “Cong zhenpin dao dupin: yapianlei wuzhi de daodejingjixue” [The Social Life of Opiates in the Moral Economy of the Nuosu]. Journal of Chinese Dietary Culture 6 (1): 27-61.

賴擁連，2013，〈從西方社會成癮性監禁政策檢視我國當前的重刑化刑事政策〉，法務部編，《刑事政策與犯罪研究論文集（16）》：43-70，台北：法務部。Lai, Yunglien. 2013. “Cong xifang she hui chengyinxin gjianjin zhengce jianzhi woguo dangqian de zhongxinghua xingshi zhengce”[Examining Taiwan’s Aggravating Punishment of the Present Criminal Policy from the Penal Policy of Addiction in the Western Society]. In Xingshi zhengce yu fanzui yanjiu lunwenji [Colloquia of Penal Policy and Criminal Research (16)], ed. Ministry of Justice. Taipei: Ministry of Justice.