透過您的圖書館登入
IP:52.14.244.195
  • 期刊

Testing for Complementarities and Substitutabilities among Marketing Arrangements Used by U.S. Farmers

美國農民產銷管道之互補性與替代性檢驗

摘要


使用某一組織模式或實作如果能夠增加(減少)另一種組織模式的邊際報酬則兩種組織模式稱之為具有互補性(替代性)。本研究探討產銷通路間的相關性並控制農場與農民可觀察到與不可觀察到的異質性,以此檢驗美國農民所使用不同的產銷通路是否具有互補性或替代性的可能。本研究以模擬最大概似法 (simulated maximum likelihood method, SMLE) 估計具有無法觀察到之異質性的機率單元 (Probit) 模型。研究結果顯示不同的產銷通路間具有替代性,此結果在不同的農產品與不同的計量模型設定下都具有相當一致的結果。

並列摘要


Two organizational modes or practices are said to be complements (substitutes) if the implementation of one practice increases (decreases) the marginal return of using the other practice. In this study, we test for the implication of complementarities and substitutabilities among various marketing arrangements used by U.S. farmers by examining the correlation among marketing arrangements (practices) conditional on farm/farmer observed and unobserved heterogeneities. The Probit model with unobserved heterogeneity is estimated using the simulated maximum likelihood method (SMLE). In our results, we found substitutabilities among different marketing arrangements. The results are robust across different commodities and across different econometric specifications.

參考文獻


Anderson, E.,Schmittlein, D.(1984).Integration of the Sales Force: An Empirical Examination.Rand Journal of Economics.15(3),385-395.
Arora, A.,Gambardella, A.(1990).Complementarity and External Linkages: The Strategies of the Large Firms in Biotechnology.Journal of Industrial Economics.38,262-379.
Athey, S.,Stern, S.(1998).An Empirical Framework for Testing Theories about Complementarities in Organizational Design.NBER Working Paper.(NBER Working Paper).,未出版National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.=NBER, Inc..
Autor, D.,Katz, L.,Krueger, A.(1998).Computing Inequality: Have Computers Changed the Labor Market?.Quarterly Journal of Economics.113(4),1169-1213.
Bai, C.,Xu, L. C.(2005).Incentives for CEOs with Multitasks: Evidence from Chinese State-owned Enterprises.Journal of Comparative Economics.33,517-539.

延伸閱讀