透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.144.244.44
  • 期刊
  • OpenAccess

Competency-based Medical Education: Philosophy, What, How, Why, and the Challenges Therein

摘要


Regulatory bodies worldwide have observed unacceptable levels of competence deficit among resident physicians. This has prompted their championing of competency-based medical education (CBME), an outcome-based paradigm that is compatible with self-directed, life-long learning philosophy and focuses on graduate competencies rather than a predetermined time frame for graduation. With the increasing spread of this paradigm around the globe, regulatory bodies have developed competency frameworks to guide curriculum, but there are significant challenges to its actualization within medical curricula. We are currently at the stage of CBME evolution where medical educators are working on establishing a common understanding of the concept and its workings. Medical schools and educators still struggle with defining the various terminologies in the CBME lexicon. Implementation of this new medical education paradigm would require a change in mindset that calls for an intense focus on individualized learning with greater use of ipsative and criterion-referenced assessments that focus on individual progression rather than the commonly used norm-referenced assessment that evaluates the trainee relative to whole class performance. A full-blown CBME has the potential to revolutionize medical education management with admissions of cohorts of students with variable (individualized) graduation dates in curricula based on standardization of outcomes and individualization of learning. That may be difficult to fathom but is perhaps the way to the future of medical education. Understanding the fundamental precepts of this educational philosophy, including its history, etymology, and application would be essential to tackling the potential challenges to its successful implementation. The philosophical basis and interplay of these factors are discussed.

參考文獻


2. Achike FI. The challenges of integration in an innovative modern medical curriculum. Med Sci Educ, 2015. (DOI: 10.1007/s40670-015-0206-7).
3. Harden RM, Sowden S, Dunn WR. Some education strategies in curriculum development: the SPICES model. ASME medical education booklet 18. Med Educ. 1984; 18:284-297.
10. Morcke AM, Dornan T, Eika B. Outcome (competency) based education: an exploration of its origins, theoretical basis, and empirical evidence. Adv in Health Sci Educ. 2013; 18: 851- 863.
12. Illing JC, Morrow GM, Rothwell CR, Burford BC, Baldauf BK, Davies CL, Peile EB, Spencer JA, Johnson N, Allen M, Morrison J. Perceptions of UK medical graduates' preparedness for practice: A multi-centre qualitative study reflecting the importance of learning on the job. BMC Medical Education 2013, 13:34. http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6920/13/34.
13. Chen AC, Kotliar D. Drolet BC. Medical education in the United Sates: do residents feel prepared? Perspect. Med Educ. 2015;4:181-185.

被引用紀錄


Achike, F. I., Batta, S., Duncan, C., Fomunung, C. K., Mittal, A., Pierce, A. D. P., Powell, S., Ramy, M., Singleton, M., & Watson, P. K. (2023). Developing a Novel Anti-Bias Curriculum for Medical School. Journal of Medical Education, 27(1), 26-40. https://doi.org/10.6145/jme.202303_27(1).0001

延伸閱讀