透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.188.44.223

摘要


本文評論跟氣候變遷不可分割的倫理元素,包括在碳排放權的配置的公平的論理。用島國馬爾地夫近年由環境導致的威脅,聚焦氣候變遷所涉及的環境風險的製造與分擔的倫理問題,論述氣候變遷的經濟學分析所採用的成本效益分析所隱藏的倫理及價值成分,並簡要評論碳排放權配置的不同建議所涉及的倫理的涵義。

參考文獻


楊樺,2009,〈搶救馬爾地夫,島嶼將沈!馬爾地夫總統籲抗暖化〉,2009 年09 月28 日, 取自http://tw.news.yahoo.com/article/url/d/a/090928/8/1ryyy.html
Revkin, A. C. and Broder, J. M. 2009, “A Grudging Accord in Climate Talks.” Retrieved December 20, 2009, from http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/20/science/earth/20accord.html
Stern, N. et al. 2007, Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change, Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. Also available at http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/independent_reviews/stern_review_economics_climate_change/stern_review_report.cfm, retrieved on April 6, 2008.
Aldy, J. E.,Stavins, R. N.(2008).Climate Policy Architecture for the Post-Kyoto World.Environment.50,6-17.
Broome, J.(2008).The Ethics of Climate Change.Scientific American.298(6),97-102..

延伸閱讀