新儒學經營因果循環分析未採用聯立方程法的論述

Argumentation on Why Simultaneous Equation Approach is Not Used in Neo-Confucian Causal Cycle Analyses of Business Operations

林國雄(Kuo-Hsiung Lin)

《交大管理學報》 27卷1期 (2007/06) Pp. 247-287

https://doi.org/10.6401/CMR.200706.0247

摘要

本文提出並回答下列兩個問題：1．為何新儒學經營因果循環分析的每一行為方程式，不用聯立方程法的設定及迴歸來求算其迴歸係數及迴歸常數？2．為何此經營因果循環的分析不存在聯立方程法的結構式及縮減式？本文己完成了單向因果循環順序性主因的深入而充分的論述。

關鍵字

新儒學因果循環分析 ； 聯立方程法 ； 順序性主因

並列摘要

The author tries to reflect and react to the following two issues: 1. Why the specification and regression of simultaneous equation approach were not used to calculate the regression coefficient and regression constant of each behavioral equation in Neo-Confucian causal cycle analyses of business operations? 2. Why the structural form and reduced form in simultaneous equation approach do not exist in these causal cycle analyses in business operations? In this paper, he has done deep and sufficient argumentation on the ordinal major causes of these one-way causal cycles.

並列關鍵字

Neo-Confucian causal cycle analyses ； simultaneous equation approach ； ordinal major causes

參考文獻

Brugha, Cathal M.(1998).The Structure of Qualitative Decision Making.European Journal of Operational Research.104(1),46-62.

Brugha, Cathal M.(1998).The Structure of Adjustment Decision Making.European Journal of Operational Research.104(1),63-76.

Brugha, Cathal M.(1998).The Structure of Development Decision Making.European Journal of Operational Research.104(1),77-92.

Brugha, Cathal M.(2001).Systemic Thinking in China: A Meta-Decision-Making Bridge to Western Concepts.Systemic Practice and Action Research.(Systemic Practice and Action Research).,未出版.

Chan, Wing-tsit(1989).(Chu His, New Studies).