透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.144.48.135
  • 期刊

老人非正式和正式照顧體系關係之初探:從家人和日託中心工作員協助項目的比較分析出發

The Relationship between Informal and Formal Care Systems for Elderly People: An Analysis of the Care Tasks Provided by Family Caregivers and Daycare Workers

若您是本文的作者,可授權文章由華藝線上圖書館中協助推廣。

摘要


本文試圖從家人和日託中心工作員對老人提供協助項目的比較分析,來檢證有關老人非正式和正式關係之三種理論模式:層級補償模式(hierarchical compensatory model)、職務取向模式(task specific model)、及補充模式(supplemental)。資料的蒐集方式為面訪問卷調查,計訪問了六所日託中心的92名老人使用者。 研究發現可歸納為下列四項結論:(一)使用日託服務的老人仍從家人獲得許多協助,這也意味著日託中心工作員不能完全替代家人,故「正式服務會取代家庭照顧」是一種迷思,此一發現駁斥了層級補償模式所主張的”各要素之相互替代性“。(二)非正式照顧體系(家人)的照顧和正式體系(老人日託中心工作員)的協助項目不是「全然分工」,也不是「完全重複」,而是「部分重複相同、部分分工不同」,故較符合補充模式的理論。此一發現可能因本研究的正式服務係以日間照護服務方案為例,而日間照護方案的目的原就具有補充家庭照顧的意含。(三)當老人可從家人和工作員獲得相同項目的協助之同時,老人接受家人的協助感到較自在,此一發現證實家人仍是老人支持要素中的優勢偏好。(四)家人和日託中心工作員提供相異的工作項目之比較分析顯示:家人提供的協助項目是非技術性的,且這些協助要求地理上的鄰近性及長期的時間投入;反之,日託中心工作員所提供的服務是可預測的、例行化的、需要技術性知識,此一結果也部份支持職務分工模式的主張。本文最後並針對研究發現提出老人福利政策和未來研究方向的建議。

並列摘要


The purpose of this paper is to examine the relationship between informal and formal care systems for the elderly. An interview survey of 92 day care users was conducted to collect data. The conclusions can be drawn from the findings: First of all, although elderly people use day care service, they still receive lots of assistance from family members. That is, day care workers can not completely substitute family caregivers, and therefore the assumption that formal services will substitute family care is merely a myth. Secondly, the tasks provided by day care workers are not completely different from the assistance given by family caregivers, neither are they totally the same. In other words, the finding suggests that the relationship between informal and formal care is supplemental. In addition, the comparison of different tasks indicated that family members tend to give help which require only everyday knowledge and face-to-face proximity, while day care workers are more inclined to provide predictable tasks which require technical knowledge. Thirdly, when elderly people can receive the assistance both from day care workers and family caregivers, they feel more comfortable with family assistance. The finding, to some degree, support the hypothesis that family is the most preferred. Finally, policy implications and future research directions are discussed.

參考文獻


Cantor, Marjorie(1991).Family and Community: Changing Roles in and Aging Society.The Gerontologist.31(3)
Cantor, Marjorie, Little, Virginia(1985).Handbook of Aging and Social Sciences.New York:Vab Nostrand Rienhold.
Chappell, L. Neena(1990).Handbook of Aging and Social Sciences.Academic Press.
Chappell, Neena, Blandford, Audrey(1991).Informal and Formal Care: Exploring the Complementarity.Aging and Society.11(3)
George, K Linda(1987).Health in Aging: Sociological Issues and PolicyDirection.New York:Springer.

被引用紀錄


蔡辰苹(2013)。以社會資本探討屏東縣泰武鄉平和社區發展協會之發展〔碩士論文,長榮大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6833/CJCU.2013.00186
蔡雅竹(2014)。論我國長期照護雙法草案及其法律問題—兼論德國之長照保險制度〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2014.02286
林青璇(2004)。失能老人家庭僱用外籍家庭監護工的決定過程--配偶照顧者的角色及參與情形之探討〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2004.01112
陳美妙(2001)。機構式喘息服務對失能老人主要照顧者負荷之影響〔碩士論文,臺北醫學大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0007-1704200714395212
吳雪玉(2004)。老人接受社區型日間照護計畫之成效評估〔碩士論文,臺北醫學大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0007-1704200714562646

延伸閱讀