透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.138.141.202
  • 期刊

社會排除:流行或挑戰

Social Exclusion: A Buzz-word or a Real Challenge

摘要


本文經由對社會排除概念以及歐洲國家社會排除現象及研究之探討,而對近十年的歐洲社會排除議題脈絡進行初步的歸納,期待可以作為提供台灣本土研究之參考。藉由文獻探析來分析社會排除的理論性概念意義,以及經由政策與理論性的討論對社會排除的社會政策思維進行歸納。本文指出,歐盟組織與學者對社會排除議題的討論,可以分為二條路線:「那些人是被排除的?」/「那些地區是社會排除較嚴重的地區?」以及分析「排除如何發生、排除的過程是什麼?」,即對社會排除進行測量及對社會排除過程予以探討。另在反社會排除政策方面,歐洲學者及主要國家的反社會排除政策思維可以分為藉由就業、社會支持與參與,以及倡議公民權三條路線。本文亦從社會建構觀點對歐洲目前的社會排除研究與政策提出反省。最後,本文指出:台灣已具有若干發生社會排除的結構條件與壓力,及出現若干排除的論述建構,而具備社會排除論述的條件,而建議應避免排除性的論述及將自覺地反省融入到政策設計之中。

並列摘要


The purpose of this paper intended to analyze the new phenomena and issues of social exclusion in the context of Social Agenda of European Union in these two decades. The origin and development of social exclusion concept have been reviewed both from theoretical and structural perspectives. According to the various research paradigms for social exclusion and anti-exclusion strategies developed in EU countries, the author traced and signified that there are two main social exclusion research paradigms to understand and explain social exclusion. The first route is by measuring social exclusion and monitoring what level social exclusion is. Or the second route, by identifying the excluded groups and recognizing the social context that these groups' living courses had confronted to understand how social exclusion happened. Apart from the research paradigm, researcher also concluded that the anti-exclusion policies in EU fall into three categories: reforming employment policy to combat social exclusion, encouraging social and community participation, and advocating equal civil right to reconstruct and alter exclusion. These findings offer the path and help to identify and construct the research framework when research concern turns to understand Taiwan's social exclusion phenomena and to develop policy formation.

參考文獻


李易駿(2003)。全球化與東亞社會政策變遷初探:1900-2000。社會政策與社會工作學刊。7(2),71-120。
夏曉鵑(2001)。「外籍新娘」現象之媒體建構。台灣社會研究季刊。43,153-196。
Abrahamson, P.(2003).Researching Poverty and Social Exclusion in Europe.Journal of European Social Policy.13(3),281-285.
Alcock, P.,P. Alcock,A. Erskine,M. May(2002).Social Exclusion.(The Blackwell Dictionary of Social Policy).
Alcock, P.,P. Alcock,A. Erskine,M. May(2002).Social Exclusion.(The Blackwell Dictionary of Social Policy).

被引用紀錄


邵怡薰(2018)。巴西邊緣孩童社會納入之研究: 以《Criança Esperança孩童希望計劃》為例〔碩士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2018.00132
李冠諭(2011)。西班牙青少年失業及就業政策〔碩士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2011.00115
王暉仁(2013)。以社會企業概念探討勵馨基金會物資中心之發展〔碩士論文,長榮大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6833/CJCU.2013.00112
王潔媛(2016)。外籍看護工在台灣私立小型長期照顧機構之勞動經驗及社會融合〔博士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU201603753
黃鈺琦(2015)。社會排除與文化再生──艋舺包容性規劃的浮現〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2015.02365

延伸閱讀


國際替代計量