透過您的圖書館登入
IP:44.203.235.24
  • 期刊

「病人」、「犯人」或「個人」?男性家暴「加害人」之再認識

「Patient」、「Offender」 or 「Person」? Rethinking the Male Offender in the Family Violence Prevention System

摘要


本文的目的是對現今家庭暴力防治體制對家暴事件去脈絡化地將加害人獨立出來承擔起家暴責任的理解視框進行反思。加害人的暴力行爲被視爲因個人身心病理因素或認知上的父權心態所致,需接受專業人員輔導與教育的「協助」,導正偏差的暴力認知與行爲。在這種個人歸因的理解架構下,加害人的聲音在現行家暴防治體制中是不被聽見與理解的。本研究從加害人主觀經驗出發,以解釋性互動論分析六位已完成加害人處遇計畫的男性個案。研究結果有三:一、家暴防治體制單一化和簡化的視角,將加害人經驗邊緣化,漠視加害人極力澄清自己是「壞人」的烙印、表達自己也是受害者、是需要幫忙的心聲:二、相對於加害人是家庭破壞者的刻板印象,加害人也努力想維繫完整的家,但認爲家庭暴力防治體制所想像的協助方式,不但無助鈴家庭關係的維繫,反而破壞家庭:三、加害人是父權制度與勞動市場雙重壓迫下的受害者,特別是,當中下階層的加害人遭受勞動市場壓迫時,更無力遊刃於現代與傳統男性角色之間。本研究建議,加害人處遇計畫的專業者,應反思由家暴防治體制所複製的個人化矯治和輔導視框,以李重和接納的態度來理解加害人的生命經驗,開顯加害人「多元」主體性與輔導策略。

並列摘要


The current domestic violence prevention mechanism puts domestic violence into a de-contextualization framework, which singles out the offenders as solely responsible for the domestic violence. The violent behavior of the offenders is deemed originated from psycho-physiological disorder or patriarchal attitude, and so the offenders need assistance and education from the professionals to correct their perception and violent behavior. This study focused on the offenders' subjective experience and, in the context of interpretive interactionism, analysed six cases of male offenders who already completed offender's treatment programs. There were three major results: 1. the domestic violence prevention mechanism's approach was over simplified. It marginalized the offenders' experience, and the offenders' own wishes and needs were neglected, such as wishing to remove the label of 'villain', or the feeling that they were also victims and needed help. 2. The offenders made effort in the hope of maintaining their family, however they felt that the assistance imposed by the domestic violence prevention mechanism was not only unhelpful, but destructive to the preservation of the family. 3. The offenders fell victim under the two-fold pressure from traditional patriarchal value and the labor market. In particular, when the middle-lower class male offenders suffered from the suppress from the labor market, it became immensely difficult for them to find a standpoint between the traditional and the modern role. This study proposes that the professionals who work in the offender's treatment programs shall reflect upon their framework of correction and assistance developed by the domestic violence prevention mechanism. It is also suggested that the professionals shall understand the offenders' life experience with respect and acceptance.

參考文獻


張芳榮、李娟娟、謝宏林、王梅麗、張達仁(2005)。家庭暴力加害人非自願性團體治療之團體歷程探討。中華團體心理治療。11(2),1-13。
王行(2007)。文化與政治下的權力與暴力輔導被認定的施虐者之思辯敘事。應用心理研究。34,229-252。
翁開誠(2002)。覺解我的治療理論與實踐:通過故事來成人之美。應用心理研究。16,23-69。
陳若璋(1992)。台灣婚姻暴力之本質、歷程與影響。婦女與兩性學刊。3,117-147。
內政部( 2002 ) 。《各直轄市、縣( 市) 政府配合辦理家庭暴力相對人鑑定及加害人處遇計畫之作業參考流程》。內政部家庭暴力及性侵害防治委員會網頁(http://dspc.moi.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=1336&ctNode=464&mp=2)

被引用紀錄


劉怡芳(2014)。在保護與處罰之間-探討兒童及少年性侵害加害人處遇服務現況-以三個縣市為例〔碩士論文,國立屏東科技大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6346%2fNPUST.2014.00094
許家嘉(2017)。從性別看家暴服務處:女性社工服務男性相對人經驗〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342%2fNTU201703969
鍾揚傑(2012)。保護性業務社工員感受之督導功能與其情緒勞務相關因素研究〔碩士論文,朝陽科技大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0078-1511201214174182
王詩涵(2012)。社會工作者服務男性相對人之處遇服務經驗初探〔碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0021-1610201315313543
劉彥岑(2013)。猶抱琵琶半遮面:一位親密關係受暴男性的生命故事〔碩士論文,國立臺北大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0023-3001201302042200

延伸閱讀