目標導向與趨向或逃避行為之關係探討

The Relationship between Goal Orientation and Avoidance Behavior of College Students

劉佩雲(Pei-Yun Liu)

《課程與教學》 12卷3期 (2009/07) Pp. 213-240

https://doi.org/10.6384/CIQ.200907.0213

摘要

本研究以四向度成就目標理論為基，探究421位大學生適應／不適應行為組型的學習內在歷程模式，並以結構方程模式(SEM)驗證此目標動機策略行為模式的適配度。研究結果顯示“目標動機策略行為模式在SEM考驗上除易受樣本數影響的卡方值外，大多數模式考驗的適酣指標顯示本模式與觀察資料可以適酣。模式中各變項間的效果也支持本研究的假定“四向度目標導向（趨向精熟、趨向表現、逃避精熟與逃避表現）會透過學習動機與學習策略，分別對學習產生正向適應效果的趨向行為，或負向不適應效果之逃避行為。而結構方程模式與階層迴歸模式的分析結果顯示學習動機與學習策略是目標導向與適應／不適應行為組型的中介。

關鍵字

目標導向 ； 逃避行為 ； 適應行為組型 ； 趨向行為

並列摘要

The purpose of the study was to verify the goodness of fit between empirically observed data of college students and the learning model of goal orientation. The participants were 421 freshmen from eight universities in Taiwan. The instruments used in this study included: the goals scale, the learning motivation scale, the learning strategy scale, the approach behavior scale, and the avoidance behavior scale. The results of this study were as follows: Although the value of chi-square was significant at .05 level, other overall and internal structure model fit indexes showed that the learning model of goal orientation fitted the observed data. Learning motivation and learning strategy were the mediating variables between four dimensions of goal orientation and avoidance (or approach) behavior. Suggestions for further research were also made in the study.

並列關鍵字

adaptive learning pattern ； approach behavior ； avoidance behavior ； goal orientation

參考文獻

程炳林(2003)。四向度目標導向模式之研究。師大學報：教育類。48(1)，15-40。

程炳林、林清山(2001)。中學生自我調整學習量表之建構及其信、效度研究。測驗年刊。48(1)，1-41。

程炳林、林清山(2002)。學習歷程前決策與後決策階段中行動控制的中介角色。教育心理學報。34(1)，43-60。

程炳林(2002)。大學生學習工作、動機問題與自我調整學習策略之關係。教育心理學報。33(2)，79-100。

Ames, C.,Archer, J.(1988).Achievement goals in the classroom: Students’ learning strategies and motivation process.Journal of Educational Psychology.80,260-267.