從PISA2009建構反應題剖析臺灣學生的閱讀問題

The Analysis of Taiwan Students Reading Problem in PISA 2009 Constructed-Response Items

鄒慧英(Hue-Ying Tzou) ； 黃秀霜(Hsiu-Shuang Huang) ； 陳昌明(C. M. Chen)

《課程與教學》 14卷4期 (2011/10) Pp. 25-48

https://doi.org/10.6384/CIQ.201110.0026

摘要

國際學生能力評量計畫PISA 2009調查報告出爐，臺灣2009的表現與2006相去不遠，為進一步深思與探究臺灣學生的閱讀評量表現，本文以文本分析法剖析臺灣學生於PISA 2009閱讀評量建構反應題可能隱含的閱讀問題。本研究以臺灣學生於PISA 2009閱讀評量標準版範例試題中的三道建構反應題之作答文本進行分析討論，結果發現臺灣低表現水準學生的問題有四：（1）使用注音符號、錯別字或語句不通順；（2）未作答的比例偏高；（3）無法掌握題目關鍵，所寫答案與題目要求不符；（4）忽略應依據文本作答。

關鍵字

國際學生能力評量計畫 ； 建構反應題 ； 閱讀素養

並列摘要

As it is evident from the results of the Program for International Students Assessment (PISA) 2009, the average performances of Taiwan students were not much different between the PISA 2006 and PISA 2009 survey cycles. In order to have a deep understanding of Taiwan students' performance on the reading assessment, the current study uses textual analysis for the constructed response items to explore students' potential reading problems. Three constructed-response items released in the PISA 2009 results are used for the analyses and discussion. The study concludes that low performers in Taiwan have the following characteristics. They tend to use phonetic symbols rather than Chinese characters. Misuses of words and/or grammar are often seen in their responses. The nonresponse rate is relatively high, and if there are valid responses, they do not correspond to the questions appropriately, which implies that students are not able to handle what has been measured. Sometimes, students even ignore the prompts and give their answers which are either not related to the prompts provided or not tied to the questions being asked.

並列關鍵字

PISA ； Constructed-response item ； reading literacy

參考文獻

Carley, K.(1993).Coding choices for textual analysis: A comparison of content analysis and map analysis.Sociological Methodology.23,75-126.

Carnegie Council on Advancing Adolescent Literacy(2010).Time to act: An agenda for advancing adolescent literacy for college and career success.New York, NY:Carnegie Corporation of New York.

Graham, S.,Hebert, M. A.(2010).Writing to read: Evidence for how writing can improve reading.A Carnegie Corporation Time to Act Report.(A Carnegie Corporation Time to Act Report).,::Alliance for Excellent Education.

Mendelovits, J.,Searle, D.(2009).PISA for teachers: Interpreting and using information from an international reading assessment in the classroom.ACER Research Conference 2009, Assessment and Student Learning:Collecting, interpreting and using data to inform teaching.(ACER Research Conference 2009, Assessment and Student Learning:Collecting, interpreting and using data to inform teaching).:

OECD(2010).PISA 2009 Results: What Students Know and Can Do- Student Performance in Reading, Mathematics and Science.