課程字源的宗教根源及意涵

The Religious Origin of Curricular Etymology and Its Implications

鍾鴻銘(Horng-Ming Jong)

《課程與教學》 18卷4期 (2015/10) Pp. 85-106

https://doi.org/10.6384/CIQ.201510_18(4).0004

摘要

依課程史學者D. Hamilton的考掘，課程一字乃於文藝復興及宗教改革時期的教育改革背景中首度成為歐洲的教育用詞。課程的出現實有其特殊意涵。在此之前，「課程」並不存在，因此僅能稱之為前課程時代。十六世紀末，課程開始成為教育用語。課程之始用與P. Ramus對辯證法的改造和J. Calvin寓意性地使＂vitae curriculum＂有關。本文之目的即在探究課程字源義的宗教根源，以及課程學者所闡釋的意涵。

關鍵字

課程字源 ； 生命履歷 ； 拉莫斯 ； 喀爾文教派 ； 課程史

並列摘要

Curricular historian D. Hamilton indicated that since the word ＂curriculum＂ first appeared as an educational word in European education reform during Renaissance and Reformation, it had a special implication. Before then, there was no curriculum and it was named the pre-curriculum period. In the late 16th century, curriculum began to be used in educational contexts. The first appearance of curriculum was concerned with the revision of dialectic by P. Ramus and the figurative usage of the word ＂vitae curriculum＂ by J. Calvin. The aims of this paper are to research on religious origin of curricular etymology and its implications which curricular theorists explicated.

並列關鍵字

the etymology of curriculum ； curriculum vitae ； Peter Ramus ； Calvinist ； history of curriculum

參考文獻

林玉体(2010)。西洋教育史。臺北:文景。

甄曉蘭(2004)。課程理論與實務─解構與重建。臺北:高等教育。

單文經編(2004)。課程與教學新論。臺北:心理。

Pinar, W. F.(Ed.)(1975).Curriculum theorizing: The reconceptualists.Berkeley, CA:McCutchan.

Doll, W. E., Jr.(2012).Complexity and the culture of curriculum.Complicity: An International Journal of Complexity and Education.9(1),10-29.