透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.117.153.38
  • 期刊

教科書研究的整合取徑─混合方法研究

The Integrated Approach of Textbook Research : Mixed Methods Research

摘要


過去的教科書研究常偏向質性或量化研究,在研究的深度及廣度上受到採用單一方法的限制。近年來,多重方法的教科書研究日增,方法的綜合應用被認為有助於教科書研究整體品質的掌握。當前社會科學領域倡導「混合方法研究」的觀點,強調質性與量化研究方法的整合,為學術研究者在質性與量化研究之外,提供了另一個選擇的取徑。由於教科書研究是一個相當複雜的領域,混合方法研究的觀點擴展了教科書研究方法的選用範圍,強化教科書研究方法設計的潛力,值得探究。本文目的在於:一、釐清教科書研究的範圍;二、了解教科書研究的趨勢;三、闡釋「混合方法研究」的本質;四、探究「混合方法研究」在教科書研究上的應用。

並列摘要


In the past, textbook research tended to adopt either qualitative or quantitative method. However, using a single method approach usually limits the depth and the breadth of research findings. There has been a significant increase in using mixed methods for textbook research recently. The comprehensive application of mixed methods has been considered a vital factor that contributes to the overall quality of textbook research. Currently, the mixed methods research which emphasizes the integration of qualitative and quantitative methods has been advocated by scholars in the field of social science. This approach has offered an alternative opportunity for textbook research, in addition to the traditional types of qualitative or quantitative research. Since textbook research is a very complex field that usually demands multiple methods, the mixed methods research approach is of great potential in expanding the scope and the quality of textbook research. Therefore, this article aimed to: (1) clarify the scope of textbook research; (2) understand trends in textbook research; (3) elaborate on the nature of mixed methods research; and (4) explore the application of mixed methods research to textbook research.

參考文獻


王雅玄(2005)。社會領域教科書的批判論述分析:方法論的重建。教育研究集刊。51(2),67-97。
陳慶民、廖柏森(2015)。專家與譯者翻譯對科學教科書讀者理解程度的影響。翻譯學研究集刊。19,17-41。
唐淑華、蔡孟寧、林烘煜(2015)。多文本課外閱讀對增進國中學生理解歷史主題之研究:以「外侮」主題為例。教育科學研究期刊。60(3),63-94。
張欣怡、張淑苑、羅慶璋、洪振方(2015)。知識整合數位課程促進學生科學素養:以化學反應概念為例。教育科學研究期刊。60(3),153-181。
陳海泓(2015)。CORI 融入社會領域教學對國民小學五年級學生閱讀成效的影響。教育科學研究期刊。60(1),99-129。

延伸閱讀