國民小學教師績效責任領導量表之發展與運用

The Development and Application of the Accountability Leadership Scale for Elementary School Teachers

張文權(Wen-Cheng Chang) ； 范熾文(Chi-Wen Fan)

《課程與教學》 21卷2期 (2018/04) Pp. 169-198

https://doi.org/10.6384/CIQ.201804_21(2).0007

摘要

本研究目的在發展適切的國小教師績效責任領導量表，並依此評估現況。首先，參考相關文獻確立概念結構，繼而發展測量題項，再透過預試樣本進行項目分析與探索性因素分析，確立因素層面。接續，取樣612位國小教師為正式樣本；為確認測量模式之適切性，利用模型競爭策略，選定二階單因素模型做為量表之驗證模型；並藉由個別項目信度、組成信度、平均變異數抽取量、幅合效度、區別效度、效標關聯與複核效化等方法，檢驗模型之信效度。最後，依據量表衡量現況。研究結果顯示，本研究發展量表包括重信守諾的領導作為、公平開放的正向文化、學生學習為績效責任、合作的專業學習社群等四個潛在因素，共計19題，均具良好之信效度。此外，量表整體及各層面的表現為中上程度，以學生學習為績效責任認同度最高，而不同性別、職務別之教師，在知覺程度上有所差異。

關鍵字

績效責任領導 ； 教師領導 ； 量表發展 ； 教師專業

並列摘要

This study aims to develop an accountability leadership scale for elementary school teachers so as to evaluate its accountability on the leadership. First, the conceptual structure of the scale was defined through the related literature reviews to develop the measurement items. Then, an item analysis and exploratory factor analysis were carried out with the pre-test subjects to establish the factors. Then, the formal data were collected from 612 elementary school teachers, and the 2nd-order single factor modeling was chosen through the competitive strategy to confirm the appropriateness of the measurement model. Next, the reliability and validity of the model were examined in terms of its reliability of individual items, as well as the composite reliability, extracted average variance, convergent validity, discriminant validity, criterion-related validity, and cross-validation. Finally, the actual results based on the scale developed were measured. The results show that in the accountability leadership scale for teachers appear in the 4 latent factors, including ＂promise-keeping leadership behaviors,＂ ＂an open and fair positive culture,＂ ＂student learning as the accountability,＂ and ＂a cooperative professional learning community,＂ in which 19 items consisted with good reliability and validity. In addition, the overall and individual performance of the scale developed were at an above-average level; ＂student learning as accountability＂ obtained the highest recognition among the 4 factors, and the teachers' characteristics were considered significantly different from genders and job positions.

並列關鍵字

accountability leadership ； scale development ； teacher leadership ； teacher professional

參考文獻

劉芳玲、王文伶(2015)。國中小資源班任課教師數學專業知能及其受重視程度之研究。教育研究與發展。11(1)，1-32。

張德銳(2010)。喚醒沈睡的巨人─論教師領導在我國中小學的發展。臺北市立教育大學學報。41(2)，81-110。

張文權、范熾文、陳成宏(2017)。國民中學校長績效責任領導困境與策略之研究─質性分析取徑。教育科學研究。62(3)，57-93。

謝傳崇、謝宜君(2016)。國民小學教師正向領導對學生幸福感影響之研究：以學生學術樂觀為中介變項。師資培育與教師專業發展。9(3)，29-56。

張文權、陳慧華、范熾文(2016)。當代績效責任領導：概念、理論及對校長領導之啟示。學校行政。101，34-54。