透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.118.137.243
  • 期刊

為何日本無法追求樞紐位置:美、中東亞角力的政策選擇

Why Japan Fails to Play as the Pivot: Its Policy Choice in the Power Struggle between the U.S. and China in East Asia

摘要


本文以近年美、日、中之間的角力檢驗戰略三角理論,試圖補充理論原有假說,使其更適用於後冷戰時期的國際關係。作者將雙邊關係中的國內政治因素,諸如歷史問題、領土問題、價值觀差異、政治體制等議題放入討論,以研析美、日、中三角關係中的雙邊關係近況,以及日本為主的各國因國內政治因素而放棄尋求羅曼蒂克三角中樞紐位置的情況。研究結果顯示,美中關係及日中關係在理念層次各自受到價值觀差異及民族主義情緒所限制,一直呈現「負面/對稱」情況,阻礙其改善關係。尤其,日本在改善日中關係上,在國內政治上受日相安倍的歷史詮釋及厭中輿論限制,使其難以追求樞紐位置。

並列摘要


With the power struggle between the U.S., Japan, and China, this paper is aimed at verifying the strategic triangle theory and trying to present some additional hypotheses to the theory itself so that it can be more applicable to international relations in the post-Cold War era. The authors try to include internal political factors in bilateral relations, such as issues of history, territory, value and political difference, into their discussion, and try to analyze recent bilateral relations in the triangle of the U.S., Japan, and China, and try to explain why Japan, with its internal political issues, stops acting as the pivot in the romantic triangle. The study shows that China-American relations and China-Japanese relations are each restricted by a difference of values and by nationalist sentiment. Thus, both bilateral relations are "negative" in the ideational dimension, which impedes any effort at improving relations. Moreover, internal factors, such as Prime Minister Abe's interpretation of h istory and the public's negative attitude toward China, hinder Japan from pursuing the pivot position.

參考文獻


何思慎、陳舜仁(2010)。後小泉時代日本東亞安全戰略調整之研究。政治學報。49,71-104。
袁鶴齡、沈燦宏(2012)。從美中台戰略三角的演變:看兩岸信心建構措施的建立。東吳政治學報。30(3),51-107。
初國華、張昌吉(2010)。戰略三角理論與台灣的三角政治。問題與研究季刊。49(1),87-110。
趙建民、何思慎(2004)。日本外交中有關中國或美國優先之爭論─兼論日、中、臺新安全架構。問題與研究。43(1),83-104。
李仲維,2014/11/8。〈中日韓談判暫難突破〉,《經濟日報》,2014年11 月8 日,版A10。

延伸閱讀