紕謬弗安、未見能讀－王邦采《離騷彙訂》論諸家「七病」析探

Stirred Uneasiness from Mistaken Interpretations: Bang-Cai Wang's "The Annotations of Li Sao" on Exegetes' Seven Fallacies

吳奕正(Yi-Jheng Wu)

《輔大中研所學刊》 24期 (2010/10) Pp. 99-118

https://doi.org/10.29444/JGICLDFJCU.201010.0006

摘要

清人王邦采《離騷彙訂》一書，向來不是楚辭學界研究的「熱點」，與王氏相關的討論中，僅有其離騷三段說受到關注。王氏會於序言提及注家七病，其害之大者，〈離騷〉竟不可讀，但王氏條列病名後，並無詳述病因，只有在書中案語偶現蹤跡。本文即試圖分析七病，或者填補其中的空白，並拉開七病之層次，搜尋其中的「能讀者」。讓這樣一種注家、讀者之病，多少能有些面貌的揭露。也或許，王邦采還能從世界的邊緣，走回半步。

關鍵字

王邦采 ； 七病 ； 《離騷彙訂》 ； 讀者

並列摘要

The exegete Bang-Cai Wang of Qing Dynasty published ”The Annotations of Li Sao”, whose themes, except the tripartite analyses of Li Sao in it, have never been a focus throughout the academia of Chu Ci studies. In the prologue of the book, Bang-Cai Wang indicated that the seven major fallacies made by other exegetes while they annotated Li Sao have caused misinterpretation of it. Despite his sporadic mentioning of seven fallacies, Bang-Cai Wang did not elaborate on detailed characteristics and follow-up influences of each. Accordingly, this paper intends to unfold the very secrets of seven fallacies aforesaid and mark off their boundaries, further replenishing what lacks in Bang-Cai Wang's discourse. Moreover, we attempt to quest for any reliable exegetes while revealing the silhouettes of seven fallacies in this paper, hoping that Bang-Cai Wang could advance a bit from the margin to the core of the literary world

並列關鍵字

Bang-Cai Wang ； seven fallacies ； "The Annotations of Li Sao" ； exegetes