雖然我國係屬副熱帶海島型氣候,而有利於太陽光電及風力等再生能源之推廣、利用。但由於我國陸域優良風場之開發已近飽和,導致大型陸域風機設置地點越發靠近西部沿海人口密及地區,進而使其與鄰近民宅出現空間競合,連帶使鄰近居民對於陸域風機之設置產生疑慮。發生於2012年10月的「苑裡反瘋車」行動,尤其凸顯出我國現行對於大型陸域風機設置所涉及之土地利用與調控等法制之不足。基此,本文乃由比較法之觀點,就德國國土規劃法與建設法,以及關於風機設置許可等相關法制中與大型陸域風機設置相關之土地利用與調控規定加以說明,以期能作為日後相關單位立法或修法時之參考。
Taiwan is located in a subtropical sea-island climate zone and, therefore, is suitable for the promotion and utilization of the renewable energy, such as photovoltaic and wind power. However, as the development of optimal wind farms on the land areas in Taiwan has reached its saturation point, the onshore wind turbines have been established at locations that overlap with residential areas. Consequently, the residents in the adjacent areas of the wind turbines have become skeptical about the establishment of onshore wind turbines. In October 2012, the "Anti-Crazy Windmills Operation in Yuanli" occurred. This highlighted the fact that Taiwan lacks proper legislation regarding land use, regulation and control of the establishment of large-scale onshore wind turbines. Based on this fact, this study explains the regulations regarding "land use" and "regulation and control" of establishing large-scale onshore wind turbines by comparing the Federal Reginal Planning Act and the Federal Building Code of German law, in the hopes of helping legislative departments in the future when they establish new laws or amend related laws.