高職課程之比較研究～以廣告設計科之設計基礎與造形為中心

The Research and Comparison of Vocational School Course~Centering on the Fundamental Course of Styling and Design of Advertisement Design Apartment

曾啓雄(Chi-Shoung Tzeng) ； 劉華傑(Hua-Chiech Liu)

《設計學報》 5卷1期 (2000/06) Pp. 75-89

https://doi.org/10.6381/JD.200006.0075

摘要

隨著國家經濟的繁榮，設計教育也因應著社會的需求，得以迅速地發展。而關係著教育品質的課程內容在經過多年的體驗之後，到了必要加以檢視的地步。本研究透過高職造形與設計基礎課程擔任教師所填寫的教學進度表，來檢視教師對課程目標的掌握、課程大綱的解釋情形，並且進行七個學校之間的比較研究。最後發現這七個學校廣告設計科之造形與設計基礎課程的混亂情形，包含了對課程目標的不理解與大綱的掌握錯亂、兩課程間內容的雷同及與其他課程重疊嚴重的現象。可是，如此的混亂情形卻沒有出現在國內出版的、被當作是教科書之相關書籍中。課程被承擔任教師如此地進行，也顯現了設計教育問題的嚴重性。

關鍵字

設計教育 ； 造形 ； 設計基礎 ； 高職

並列摘要

With the prosperity of national economy, the education of design study has rapidly developed for the need of the society. However, it is time to review the contents of the courses pertaining to the quality of education after several years of experiences. Through the teaching syllabuses written by the teachers who are teaching the fundamental courses of styling and design in vocational senior high schools, this study attempts to review the conditions that a teacher masters the goals of the courses and how a teacher explains the outlines of the courses. Also this study will make a comparison of seven schools. Upon investigation, it was found that the fundamental courses of styling and design of the seven schools were in great chaos including not understanding of the goals of the two courses, mixing up of the outlines, similar contents of the two courses and the contents in these two courses and in the other courses largely overlaps. These chaotic conditions have not been presented in national published text books and any other related books. But, Why are these courses proceeding in this way? Is it the result of the attitude of thinking nothing but entering a higher school, seeking publicity or immediate utility? A further discussion should be undertaken.

並列關鍵字

design education ； Form ； design basic ； senior high school