本研究旨在探討考慮流動性風險後的選擇權定價,並比較修正後之價格是否優於Black-Scholes(1973)的評價結果。模型以Black-Scholes model為基礎,分別加入標的資產的流動性以及選擇權本身的流動性,而發展出流動性修正評價模型,並藉由數值分析中的有限差分法求取封閉解。經由實證結果發現,當選擇權契約分處不同價性等級下,評價結果均以流動性修正模型較佳,並隨著價外、價平、價內,評價誤差逐漸減少。另外,研究發現當選擇權契約處於近月時,對價內及價外的評價效果較佳,當處於遠月時,則以價外契約的評價效果為佳。
Due to the existence of liquidity risk, we propose a generalized liquidity-adjusted Black-Scholes model. This generalized model takes into account the liquidity risk of options and underlying assets simultaneously. It offers an alternative to demonstrate the effect of liquidity, with the consideration of both underlying assets and derivatives, on the cost of hedging and, consequently, pricing of derivatives. Prices of the Taiwan Stock Index call options (TXO) which are of European style are used as the data for the empirical test. The empirical results strongly support that the liquidity-adjusted Black-Scholes model outperforms the traditional Black-Scholes model.