使用階層線性模式分析學生評量教學績效之資料

本研究以168班約5400名學生為樣本，暸解個人因素與班級因素對學生評量教學品質的相對重要性，使用階層線性模式的方法，發現個人的因素解釋大部分的變異，尤其是先前的興趣與預期的分數是影響學生評量的重要因素。至於第二層的因素，如班級大小、教授的性別、教授的職級對第一層預測變數參數的影響是弱的且不顯著的。因為班級層次的變異是大的（30%和38%），未來的研究應該使用階層線性模式，探索其它教學過程的因素對學生評量的影響。

Keywords

學生評量教師績效；階層線性模式

Parallel abstracts

Student ratings were analyzed in relation to individual- and class-level factors in a sample of about 5400 students in 168 classes in order to examine the relative importance of individual-and class-level factors in the determination of student evaluation of teaching quality. Hierarchical linear models showed that individual measures accounted for most of the variance. Prior interest and expected grade were the preponderant influence on students' ratings, in terms of level-2 variables, the effect of class size, professor's gender, and rank on parameters for level-1 variables was weak and insignificant. Because class-level variation was large (30% and 38%), other contextual factors should be explored in future studies of student evaluation of teaching effectiveness and multilevel analyses.

Parallel keywords

studeut endutation of teaching effectiveness ； hierarchical linear model

References

Abrami, P.(1985).Dimensions of effective college instruction.The Review of Higher Education.8

Google Scholar

Amett, K.,Arnold, D. R.,Cochran, D. S.(1989).Improving business school student evaluation of faculty performance.Journal of Education for Business.65

Google Scholar

Bachen, C. M.,McLoughlin, M. M.,Garcia, S.(1999).Assessing the role of gender in college students'evaluations of faculty.Communication Education.48

Google Scholar

Byrk, A. S.,Raudenbush, S. W.(1992).Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods.

Google Scholar

Cited by

黃敬惠（2011）。學校對學生之加值貢獻衡量:以大學商學院為例〔碩士論文，國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2011.10226

曾明基（2020）。學生認知歷程與背景變數對於學生評鑑教師的影響：潛在類別偏差校正與混合迴歸分析。教育科學研究期刊，65(3)，251-276。https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.202009_65(3).0009

吳其為（2009）。運用階層線性模式分析都市交通運具選擇影響二氧化碳排放之研究-以台南市與高雄市為例〔碩士論文，長榮大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0015-2807200918450800

Read-around

徐志文、張雨霖、巫宜錚、許芳彬（2011）。以階層線性模式分析學校組織創新氣氛、教師教學效能對創造力教學之影響。創造學刊，2(2)，87-112。https://doi.org/10.30081/CESJ.201106.0004
陳章隆（2011）。層級分析法應用於營造工程專案績效關鍵指標評估之研究〔碩士論文，大同大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0081-3001201315111609
Liu, C. M., Hsu, H. S., Wang, S. T., & Lee, H. K. (2005). 結合層級分析法與資料包絡法分析法之績效評估模式. 工業工程學刊, 22(3), 243-251. https://doi.org/10.29977/JCIIE.200505.0007
王惠珀、李明濱、洪永泰、謝博生（1998）。Comparison of Students'　Evaluation of Teaching Effectiveness in a Medical College。Journal of Medical Education，2(3)，246-254。https://doi.org/10.6145/jme.199809_2(3).0004
蔡喬育（2016）。A Study of TCSL Teacher Self-Evaluation of Teaching Effectiveness。教育研究與發展期刊，12(1)，105-146。https://doi.org/10.3966/181665042016031201004

Altmetrics

使用階層線性模式分析學生評量教學績效之資料

Download

Read this ↓