開放式興趣量表之修訂研究－學系描述子區別分析

Strategy for the Revision of Academic Interest Inventory: Discriminant Analysis of the Descriptors of University Instructional Programs

王思峰(Sy-Feng Wang) ； 劉兆明(Chao-Ming Liu)

《測驗學刊》 57卷4期 (2010/12) Pp. 515-540

https://doi.org/10.7108/PT.201012.0515

摘要

以往開放系統類興趣量表的編製策略，大抵以所要區辨的類別自身為量表的多向度構念。但在環境變動愈來愈激烈下，開放式興趣量表面臨著修訂週期愈來愈短的難題，學系興趣量表即是如此。本研究提議以知識描述子取代以學系類別自身為構念之量表編製策略。在以美國大學科系主修學程分類(CIP)與O*NET職業資料庫資料進行之區別分析結果顯示，知識描述子的區別力遠高於Holland的RIASEC興趣描述子、也高於O*NET之技能與能力描述子，顯示此修訂策略相當可行，可作為「學系探索量表」等興趣量表修訂時之主要參考依據。

關鍵字

生涯輔導 ； 興趣量表 ； 職涯空間

並列摘要

In the past, academic interest inventory always use the classified groups to be discriminated as the multi-dimensional construct. However, due to the rapidly changing higher education environment, researchers do test developing faces the difficulty that the revision cycle of scale is shortened. This paper proposes another strategy. We hypothesize that using ”knowledge descriptor” instead of ”classified groups” is a better strategy. Databases of the Classification of Instructional Program (CIP) & O*NET are used to examine this proposition. Discriminant analysis shows that ”knowledge descriptor” has much higher discriminating power than Holland's RIASEC descriptor. It is also found that ”knowledge descriptor” has higher discriminating power than the ”skill descriptor” and the ”ability descriptor”. Implications of this revision strategy on academic interest inventory are further discussed.

並列關鍵字

career guidance ； interest inventory ； vocational space

參考文獻

American College Testing=ACT(1995).Technical manual: Revised unisex edition of the ACT Interesting Inventory (UNIACT).Iowa City, IA:American College Testing=ACT.

Betz, N. E.(1987).Use of discriminant analysis in counseling psychology research.Journal of Counseling Psychology.34,393-403.

Brown, S. D.(ed.),Lent, R. W.(ed.)(2005).Career development and counseling: Putting theory and research to work.Hoboken, NJ:John Wiley & Sons.

Converse, P. D.,Oswald, F. L.,Gillespie, M. A.,Field, K. A.,Bizot, E. B.(2004).Matching individuals to occupations using abilities and the O*NET.Personnel Psychology.57,451-478.

Costanza, D. P.,Fleishman, E. A.(1992).Fleishman job analysis survey (F-JAS), Part III: Knowledge requirements.Potomac, MD:Management Research Institute.