並列摘要
The authors reflect and explore the prevalent approach to the new virtual culture that has been taking shape through the 1990s. By examining and criticizing the various claims of the enhancement of communication and community and the possibility of virtual politics, we point out that technological culture is just another kind of utopian formulations. Communication is a means of promoting social order and control for a long time. Communications technologies are impossible to become a social and political panacea, because the fundamental social problem we faced is not a historical communications deficit. The authors think that the virtual community is the community of interests, only under conditions of virtual existence. It is a retreat from the conflicts and antagonisms of the real world. Virtual politics is thus not politics at all.
參考文獻
延伸閱讀
- 林淑芬（2005）。“人民”做主？民粹主義、民主與人民。政治與社會哲學評論，(12)，141-182。https://doi.org/10.6523/168451532005030012004
- 楊開煌（2022）。「政治」的本質在為人民謀幸福－論中國特色社會主義現代化之治理式民主。海峽評論，(374)，44-49。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=a0000495-202202-202202090006-202202090006-44-49
- 羅貴祥（2016）。沒有國家的民族：少數者的「中國」。思想，(31)，217-240。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=a0000477-201609-202002140016-202002140016-217-240
- 謝世民（2002）。Political Power, Political Authority and Political Obligation。政治與社會哲學評論，(1)，1-41。https://doi.org/10.6523/168451532002060001001
- Ian Parker、宋文里（2015）。Politics and Applied Psychology。應用心理研究，(63)，105-137。https://doi.org/10.3966/156092512015120063004