透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.117.107.90
  • 期刊

影響教師創意教學因素之研究-以綜合活動領域為例

Factors Influencing the Creative Instruction of Integrated Activities Teachers

摘要


本研究旨在探討影響綜合活動教師創意教學的因素,以曾獲綜合活動創意教學獎-特優獎的教師為研究對象,採焦點團體晤談、深度訪談、觀察法與內容分析法。研究主要發現為:影響綜合活動教師創意教學的因素有(1)思考類型-立法型,(2)人格特質-創意點子多、嘗新求變、自信、喜歡幻想、求知慾高、敏銳的自覺、接受新經驗、開放的心胸、勇於面對挑戰、面對障礙時的堅持、具有幽默感、願意成長等,(3)家庭因素-開放包容自主的教養方式、父母的身教等,(4)成長及教育歷程-童年的自創遊戲、同儕間的腦力激盪、良師的感召等,(5)教學信念、動機、個人的努力與豐富的專業經驗,以及(6)組織環境;其中又以教學信念、個人的努力和內在動機為主要的因素。本研究對培育創意教師提出具體建議。

並列摘要


A qualitative research method was used to investigate the internal and external factors that influence the ”creative instruction” of teachers in the field of Integrated Activities. Focus group interviews, in-depth interviews and classroom observation were used for data collection. Four Integrated Activities teachers who won the Creative Instruction Award for creative teaching were selected as the subjects of this study. The contents of in-depth interviews, teachers' syllabi, lesson plans, teachers' reflections and classroom observation videotapes were analyzed. Data were collected and validated through data triangulation. The following were found to be favorable teacher characteristics for creative instruction in the field of Integrative Activities: (1) thinking style: teachers have a creative and also legislative thinking style; (2) personal traits: teachers are full of ideas, attempt to make changes, are self-confident, imaginative, have a sense of humor, welcome new experiences, are curious, willing to grow, etc.; (3) family factors: teachers have open, tolerant and creative parents and also are open, tolerant and creative in dealing with their own children; (4) growth and educational experiences: teachers themselves grew up playing games created by themselves and their friends, listening to one another's stories, brainstorming with their classmates and being inspired by good teachers; and, most important of all, (5) teachers love to teach and believe in the importance of hard work and motivation, for themselves and for their students.

參考文獻


王文中、鄭英耀(2000)。創造力發展量表之編製與試題反應分析。測驗年刊。47(1),153-173。
洪久賢(2004)。綜合活動之批判性建構教學。課程與教學。7(2),57-74。
柯志恩(2004)。後設認知導向之創造思考模式在教學之應用。課程與教學季刊。7(1),15-30。
陳學志(2003)。從「哈哈」到「啊哈」-統整知、情、意、行的幽默課程對創造力培養的影響。教育心理學報。35,393-411。
邱發忠、陳學志、卓淑玲(2003)。幽默創造訓練之課程設計暨實徵效果評估。教育心理學報。34(2),179-198。

被引用紀錄


黃姵青(2015)。組織人員創新潛力指標架構與測量的建立〔碩士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2015.00598
李柏玲(2012)。實施創意教學在生活領域發展國小教師科技 學科教學知識之個案研究〔碩士論文,中原大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6840/cycu201200427
張容蘋(2015)。國小五年級綜合活動學習領域創意教學之個案研究〔碩士論文,逢甲大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6341/fcu.M0216870
陳玉樹、郭銘茜(2013)。四向度成就目標對教師創意教學表現之影響:創意自我效能的中介效果與團隊學習行為的跨層級調節效果檢定教育科學研究期刊58(3),85-120。https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.2013.58(3).04
楊端容(2008)。在生命樂章中播種希望種子〜潘寶英老師之創意生命故事〔碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0021-0804200910170067

延伸閱讀