長久以來,國家常常打著「國家安全」、「公共利益」的名義,而採取維持社會秩序的相關管制措施。由於這些管制或相關措施通常容易干預到人民之基本權利,所以人民通常會問,國家「憑什麼」及「為什麼」能這樣做,這就會牽涉到國家實施這些措施的「合法性」與「正當性」之問題。而本文主要係從公法學的觀點,來探討國家權力干預人民基本權合法性與正當性的法理根據,也就是司法對違憲法規的審查議題,尤其是從基本權的干預或限制的角度來看國家何以能將公領域的權力介入人民的私領域,在此就會牽涉到些公法上的原理原則如「法律保留」、「比例」等原則之解讀及基本權合憲性體系之相關問題。
For long ago, nations often use in name of 「national security」 and 「public benefits」 to keep social order measure. Because the rule and measures easy mess in basic human rights of people often. So people always ask why nation did that, this is question of nation clamp down on legality and proper measure. This article is in terms of public law to discuss nation power legality and proper to mess basic right of people. That is purpose of law censorship on unconstitutionality. Especially from intervene in basic human rights or abridge to see how nation can use power of public byway interfere personal byway of people. In here will involve axiom of public law and many questions of public law.