透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.116.239.195
  • 期刊

家庭主義的分歧?台灣民眾對兒童及老人照顧的福利態度分析

Divergent Familialism? Public Attitudes towards Childcare and Eldercare in Taiwan

摘要


家庭主義長久以來特徵化了東亞國家的福利發展,傳統上無論年幼子女或高齡老人的照顧多由家庭來承擔。然而東亞福利國家正在經歷轉型。由於高齡少子化的人口結構轉變,使得東亞國家逐漸擴張照顧服務政策,以協助家庭平衡其工作與家庭照顧責任。福利供給責任因此從原來僅由家庭來承擔的圖像,逐漸轉移到國家、非營利組織、家庭與市場,而有福利多元主義現象的產生。但福利國家的服務轉變仍需建立在社會大眾的民意基礎上。本文以台灣為案例,探討傳統家庭承擔照顧責任的情況目前是否因為照顧對象是兒童和老人而有所不同,分析台灣民眾如何思考兒童照顧服務與老人照顧服務應該由誰來提供,藉此補足過去東亞福利國家與福利態度研究上的缺口。本研究以2012年台灣社會變遷基本調查分析與比較台灣民眾在老人照顧與兒童照顧服務提供上的態度。本研究結果發現兒童照顧是建立在社會連帶的基礎上;但是,老人照顧服務方面卻是呈現自利為主的圖像。因此,雖然台灣民眾對於兒童照顧與老人照顧服務的供給依然是鑲嵌於家庭主義的基礎上,但是卻在不同的照顧服務領域中呈現了家庭主義的分歧。

並列摘要


Familialism is/was deeply embedded in East Asian welfare states. However, East Asian welfare states are transforming. On the one hand, family policies are expanding to help people reach a work-life balance due to socio-demographic transformations. On the other hand, the responsibility of welfare provision has been gradually shifted to non-state sectors; therefore, the idea of welfare pluralism is emerging. However, the transformation of the welfare state needs to be underpinned on the micro-foundation of the demand side, which is public opinion. Thus, this study will examine public attitudes towards childcare and eldercare services in Taiwan by analyzing the 2012 Taiwanese Social Change Survey. While our multi-nominal logistic regression models show that childcare is based on intergenerational solidarity, self-interest is more important in explaining attitudes towards eldercare policy. We conclude that despite familialism remaining significant in explaining public attitudes towards childcare and eldercare in Taiwan, divergent familialism can be found in different social policy areas in Taiwan.

並列關鍵字

familialism childcare eldercare welfare attitudes

參考文獻


葉崇揚、蔡明璋、呂建德(2017)。〈台灣民眾對社會福利的態度─體制評價、道德經濟、階級與世代的影響〉,《臺灣民主季刊》,14(2),1-48。doi: 10.6448/TDQ 【Yeh, C.-Y., Tsai, M.-C., & Lue, J.-D. (2017). Public attitudes towards social welfare policy in Taiwan: The influences of regime evaluation, moral economy and class-generations. Taiwan Democracy Quarterly, 14(2), 1-48. doi: 10.6448/TDQ】
劉毓秀(2011)。〈北歐普及照顧與充分就業政策及其決策機制的台灣轉化〉。《女學學誌》,29,1-77。doi: 10.6255/JWGS.2011.29.1 【Liu, Y.-H. (2011). Taiwan’s transformation of Scandinavian universal care and full employment policies and decision-making mechanism, Taiwan Journal of Women’s and Gender Studies, 29, 1-77. doi: 10.6255/JWGS.2011.29.1】
周怡君(2016)。〈德國與臺灣身心障礙者政策與失能者長照政策的比較分析:復健模式的觀點〉。《臺大社會工作期刊》,34,1-38。doi: 10.6171/ntuswr2016.34.01 【Chou, Y.-C. (2016). Comparison of disability policy models and long-term care policies in Germany and Taiwan: A rehabilitation-oriented perspective. NTU Social Work Review, 34, 1-38. doi: 10.6171/ntuswr2016.34.01】
陳正芬(2012)。〈我是媳婦還是看護工?外籍媳婦照顧角色形成與照顧經驗之初探〉,《臺大社會工作學刊》,26,139-182。doi: 10.6171/ntuswr2012.26.04 【Chen, C.-F. (2012). Am I a daughter-in-law or a care worker?-A study on the formation of the caretaking role and the caretaking experience of foreign daughters-in-law. NTU Social Work Review, 26, 139-182. doi: 10.6171/ntuswr2012.26.04】
王舒芸、鄭清霞、王正(2013)。〈兒童津貼之合理性與可行性研究〉。《臺大社會工作學刊》,27,45-92。doi: 10.6171/ntuswr2013.27.02 【Wang, S.-Y., Cheng, C.-H., & Wang, C. (2014). Study on rationale and preliminary planning of child allowance. NTU Social Work Review, 27, 45-92. doi: 10.6171/ntuswr2013.27.02】

被引用紀錄


利澤銘、古允文(2022)。不同的家庭主義模型?臺灣和澳門友善家庭政策比較初探臺灣社會福利學刊18(2),45-93。https://doi.org/10.6265/TJSW.202212_18(2).02

延伸閱讀