李宗偉與諶龍對戰之技術分析

2014年國際羽球總會排名第一的李宗偉與第二的諶龍為研究對象，目的是針對前場技術、中場技術、後場技術與比賽各階段得分情形，使用交叉表與百分比同質性卡方考驗。資料處理是以SPSS 22.0 for windows套裝軟體進行資料分析，設定所有顯著水準α=.05。結果在二場比賽的前場技術的使用次數，李宗偉無顯著差異（p=.088），諶龍達顯著差異（p=.014）。中場技術的使用次數李宗偉無顯著差異（p=.211），諶龍無顯著差異（p=.362）。後場技術的使用次數李宗偉無顯著差異（p=.099），諶龍無顯著差異（p=.146）。各階段得分次數，李宗偉達顯著差異（p=.034），諶龍並無顯著差異（p=.499）。結論是首先二位優秀的羽球運動員都是以網前技術相互控制，再伺機尋求有效的攻擊機會。再來為了達到控反控的目的，平抽擋的技術也在單打比賽中佔有相當使用比例。接著後場技術皆以下壓技術為主。本研究建議訓練時，應多要求一個動作多變化的擊球手法與時間差的瞬間變化技術。再來是加強中場技術提升控反控的擊球能力。

關鍵字

控反控；身材；跑動能力

並列摘要

This paper research objects are LEE Chong Wei and Chen Long who performed world ranking NO.1 and NO.2 in 2014 from Badminton World Federation. The main purpose of this research is focus on forecourt, middle court, and backcourt rally techniques and scoring in different stages. The statistics analysis adopts the contingency table and the test of homogeneity of proportion. The data processing uses SPSS 22.0 for windows. The level of significance is set to 0.05 (α=.05). Within two games data analysis, the research results reveal that the forecourt techniques serviced round for LEE Chong Wei, p=.088, is no significant difference (NSD) and for Chen Long, p=.014, is significant difference (SD). As for middle court techniques, LEE Chong Wei, p=.211, is NSD and Chen Long, p=.362, is NSD as well. The backcourt techniques analysis tells that LEE Chong Wei, p=.099, is NSD and Chen Long, p=.146, is NSD. Regarding different stages scoring analysis, LEE Chong Wei, p=.034, is SD and Chen Long, p=.499, is NSD. This paper finds that these two players are both control the game relying on the fort court techniques in the first place and then exercising shots waiting for winning opportunities. In order to countercharge the opponent, drive shots are main attracting approach. As for back court techniques, playing push and drive shots become main approach. This research suggests that playing varietal shots in one service and time-difference disguise manipulation is necessary. Another issue is enhancing middle court countercharge capability to win.