本研究以合作金控球團為對象,探討優秀運動選手的理財規劃。主要目的如下:一、棒球、桌球、羽球優秀運動員的比較來探討不同項目優秀運動員在理財規劃上的差異。二、從在職運動員與非在職運動員的比較來探討他們在理財規劃上的差異。三、從優秀男性運動員與優秀女性運動員的比較來探討兩性運動員在理財規劃上的差異。本研究採取問卷調查法,受試對象係自願參加,共分為以下三組:一、棒球運動員(Gl)N=33人。二、桌球運動員(G2)N=61人。三、羽球運動員(G3)N=51人。其平均年齡為26.18±7.10歲,三組問並無差異存在(p>.05),進行資料蒐集,接受【理財規劃】量表評量。評量所得資料以SPSS for Window 22.中文版統計套裝軟體為分析工具。結果發現:一、就不同運動項目的比較來看,以理財規劃涉及的四個部份整體分數而言,三組間皆有或多或少的個別差異現象存在(p<.05)。這顯示:不同項目優秀運動員在理財規劃上存在明顯的差異。二、就在職與非在職的比較來看,除理財規劃指標9存在非在職運動員明顯優於在職運動員的現象(p<.05)外,其餘的指標皆存在在職運動員明顯優於非在職運動員的現象(p<.05)。這顯示:在職運動員的理財規劃,就整體來看,有優於非在職運動員的趨勢。三、就男性運動員與女性運動員的比較來看,除理財規劃指標1存在男性運動員明顯優於女性運動員的現象(p<.05)外,其餘的指標皆存在男性運動員與女性運動員並無明顯差異的現象(p>.05)。這顯示:男性運動員與女性運動員的理財規劃,就整體而言,並無性別差異的現象存在。
Objective: The purposes of this study were triple. Firstly, to compare the differences of the financial planning of elite athletes among baseball, table tennis and badminton. Secondly, to compare the differences of the financial planning between elite athletes in-service and those not-in-service. Thirdly, to compare the differences of the financial planning between male elite athletes and female elite athletes. Methods: One hundred and forty-five athletes (average age 26.18±7.10yrs, p>.05) volunteered to participate in the study. They were elite athletes from Taiwan Cooperative Holdings from the following three different groups: baseball (G1, n=33), table-tennis (G2, n=61), and badminton (G3, n=51). The investigation of financial planning was conducted by using a questionnaire. The effective response rate is 100%. ANOVA and post hoc test was adopted to compare the differences among the three groups using the software package of SPSS 22.0 for Windows. Results: The outcome of the study demonstrated as below. First, the differences of the financial planning of elite athletes among baseball, table tennis and badminton were significant (p<.05). Second, as a whole, the financial planning of elite athletes in-service were significantly (p<.05) better than those not-in-service. Third, in general, the differences of the financial planning between male elite athletes and female elite athletes were not significant (p>.05).