透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.224.33.107
  • 期刊

左翼的信仰之難──讀陳映真〈加略人猶大的故事〉

The Faith Difficulty of the Left-Reading Chen Ying-zhen's Novel Iscariot Judas' Story

摘要


陳映真發表於1961年的小說〈加略人猶大的故事〉,改寫了《聖經》中猶大出賣耶穌的故事,將猶大描寫成一個走向背叛的革命者。本文重新探討了這篇小說中所展現出來的猶大的主體狀態,對於陳映真早期的左翼思想進行了反思和引申。猶大執著於行動的展開,但他的行動卻缺乏英雄的詩情和堅實的基礎,最終淪為一種骯髒的背叛。猶大代表了1960年代陳映真等臺灣左翼青年在思想上的困頓,他試圖從普世的愛中尋找主體的完全,但不可避免地因為理性的犬儒主義而無能於愛。猶大追隨了耶穌,卻只是把耶穌當作實現自己革命計畫的替代,而無法成為信仰的主體。小說在多重的參照視角下淋漓盡致地展現了猶大左翼的匱乏與空洞,從而提出了1960年代左翼的理想如何才能成長為堅實的信仰的問題。陳映真通過左翼書籍觸摸到了紅色祖國的脈動,也在對臺灣社會的深刻體認中看到了歷史的分斷所帶來的痛苦。左翼的信仰之難,不僅在於現實的禁忌,更是因為分斷導致無法向歷史與現實中獲得對於中國的實感,這一問題成為陳映真日後的思考與實踐中最核心的問題。

並列摘要


Chen Ying-zhen's novel Iscariot Judas' Story (1961), rewrote the Bible story of Judas betraying Jesus, turning Judas into a revolutionary. This article discusses the subjectivity of Judas in the novel, with reflection on Chen Ying-zhen's early leftist thinking. Judah clung to initiate actions, but his actions lacked a solid foundation and heroic poetry, and ultimately became a dirty betrayal. Judas represented Taiwan's left-wing youth's mental predicament in the 1960s. He tried to find a complete subjectivity from universal love, but failed inevitably because of his rational cynicism. Judas followed Jesus, only taking Jesus as an alternative of his revolutionary plan. So he could not be the subject of faith. In reference to multiple perspective, the novel reveals the inanition of Judas, questioning how the left-wing ideal grew into solid faith in the 1960s. Chen Ying-zhen touched by the left-wing books the pulsation of red China, but also recognized Taiwan society deeply linked to the painful broken history. It's hard to set up the leftist faith, not only because of taboos in reality, but also because of impossibility to get a real sense for China, which has become a key issue in Chen Ying-zhen's thinking and practice.

並列關鍵字

Chen Ying-zhen Iscariot Judas' Story the left China

參考文獻


白先勇(2008)。現文因緣。臺北:天下遠見。
陳映真(1988)。陳映真作品集1-15。臺北:人間出版社。
陳映真、薛毅編(2009)。陳映真文選。北京:生活‧讀書‧新知三聯書店。
陳映真(1961)。加略人猶大的故事。筆匯。2(9)
陳光興編、蘇淑芬編(2011)。陳映真:思想與文學。臺北:臺灣社會研究雜誌社。

延伸閱讀