透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.118.166.98
  • 期刊

臺灣當代特殊教育博、碩士論文主題的發展趨勢

Trends with Special Education Thesis/Dissertation Topics in Contemporary Taiwan

摘要


本文探討臺灣特殊教育(1987-2009)的2210篇博、碩士論文主題,排除重複篇名、雙重特殊生、系統錯誤三項13篇,歸納為身心障礙教育1861篇,資賦優異教育336篇。將身心障礙教育論文主題分為五個層次,以五大類型、十一中類型、十八小類型、五十六個項目和十八個小項目為基準,分別予以歸類。而336篇資賦優異教育論文主題方面,則分為四個層次,以五大類型、十中類型、六小類型、二十二個項目為基準。歸納上述二個分類系統,得出近23年臺灣特殊教育論文主題的整體趨勢為:一、研究範圍跨地區化;二、理論缺乏本土化;三、教師教學和學生生活E化;四、研究對象多元族群化;五、教學策略延展化;六、偏重實證研究取向。鑑往知來,以資國內特殊教育學術研究參考。

並列摘要


The purpose of this research was to explore 2210 special education theses/dissertations of Taiwanese 13 graduate schools of special education over the past 23 years. Owing to duplicated these/dissertations, twice exceptional theses/dissertations, and system errors, there were 1861 these/dissertations in special needs education, and 336 in gifted and talented education. Topics on these/dissertations were all classified using a same categorical system consisting of 4 levels. The system of special needs education included 5 large subgroups, 11 middle subgroups, 18 small subgroups, 56 minimal subgroups and 18 categorical items. In addition, the system of gifted and talented education also included 5 large subgroups, 10 middle subgroups, 6 small subgroups, and 22 minimal subgroups. Compared the trends of special needs education to gifted and talented education, the researcher found six mutual tendencies as follows: (1) crossregional studies; (2) lacking localization-based theories; (3) e-learning affecting the way teachers teach students with special needs, and the lifestyles of students with special needs; (4) subjects becoming multicultural/diverse; (5) applying strategies of special education to all students; (6) overemphasis on empirical studies. The above-mentioned trends could be referable indicators for the researchers and those who make efforts in the field.

參考文獻


嚴嘉楓(2010)。以性別與社會階層觀點論身心障礙者的婚姻現況與困境。身心障礙研究。8(2),111-121。
薛育青(2005)。國小資優生資優標記接受度與其自我概念、生活適應之相關研究。國立高雄師範大學特殊教育學系。
吳金香、張茂源、王昇泰(2007)。從兒童學習權觀點談「新住民子女」的教育問題。學校行政雙月刊。50,268-281。
身心障礙及資賦優異學生鑑定標準,教育部特殊教育小組(2006)
身心障礙者保護法,內政部司(2004)

延伸閱讀