進王褒而退馬融：兼釋“子淵〈洞簫〉窮變於聲貌”

Put Wang-Bao in an Important Position and Expelled Ma-Rong, and Explain "The Change of Sheng Mao in Zi-Yuan's 'Dong Xiao' "

卓國浚(Guo-Jun Zhuo)

《興大人文學報》 38期 (2007/03) Pp. 99-119

https://doi.org/10.30092/JHCLANCHU.200703.0004

摘要

《文心雕龍‧詮賦》：「子淵〈洞簫〉窮變於聲貌」。饒宗頤在比較皇甫謐與彥和之說後發現：彥和進王褒而退馬融，本文嘗試詮釋其原因。又「聲貌」一詞歷來之解釋均側重聲音形象美之書寫，筆者透過文本之相互比較與彥和在《文心雕龍》書中用「聲貌」一詞之狀況，以及貫穿《文心雕龍》的通變二元思維，將王褒〈洞簫〉放在整個賦體流變中檢驗，對「窮變於聲貌」提出不同之解釋，以為「窮變」是在相互文本影響下所開創出的新局面，在文辭氣力上的新修辭策略；「聲貌」是語言的形象美與聲律美，「窮變於聲貌」，在整個賦體流變中是一個新語體風格的起點，是在相互文本影響下新變的語體風貌。

關鍵字

文心雕龍 ； 王褒 ； 洞簫賦 ； 互文性 ； 窮變 ； 聲貌

並列摘要

”QuanFu” in ”The Literary Mind and the Carving of Dragons” says: The change of language style's form” in Zi-Yuan's Dong Xiao. After comparing the theory between Huang Pu-Mi and Yan-He, Rao Zong-Yi discovers that Yan-He put Wang-Bao in an important position and expelled Ma-Rong. Now I try to interpret the reasons. Usually, the explanation of Sheng Mao puts more emphasis on the beauty of voice and image. I bring up a different definition about ”The change of Sheng Mao” on the foundations of comparisons among contexts and the phrase ”Sheng Mao” in The Literary Mind and the Carving of Dragons as well as the examination Wang-Bao's ”Dong Xiao” on the base of the change of Fu style which passes through transforming duality thinking of The Literary Mind and the Carving of Dragons. In my opinion, ”Change” is a new situation under the anxious influences of contexts and is also a new rhetoric strategy. ”Sheng Mao” is the beauty of language's image and voice. ”The Change of Sheng Mao” is a starter of new language style in the ”Fu” style and the anxious influence of contexts.

並列關鍵字

The Literary Mind and the Carving of Dragons ； Wang-Bao ； Dong Xiao ； Intertextuality ； The Change ； Sheng Mao

參考文獻

于光華(1981)。評注昭明文選。台北:學海出版社。

王欣慧(1997)。王褒〈洞簫賦〉研究。中國文化月刊。207，92。

王弼注、韓康伯注、孔穎達正義。十三經注疏本：周易正義。台北:藝文印書館。

王禮卿(1986)。文心雕龍通解。台北:黎明文化事業有限公司。

李丹博(2003)。附聲測貌，泠然可觀－論王褒〈洞簫賦〉的藝術成就。《山西師大學報》（社會科學版）。30(2)