透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.129.195.206
  • 期刊

團體領導能力量表之編製與信、效度建構

Development of the Group Leadership Competence Sca

摘要


The study was aimed at developing an instrument for measuring trainees' competencies in leading counseling and psychotherapy groups. Foundation of the original 60 items of Group Leadership Competence Scale (GLCS) were proposed mainly based on group theory, researchers' previous research findings, group counselor training practices, and literature reviews. After evaluated by six professionals for content validity, three items CVI lower than .70 were deleted and two similar items were integrated into one, then the version of remaining 56 items were used. 258 valid samples were gathered for analyzing the critical ratio and test their internal consistency. 7 items were deleted and only 49 items were left for examining the validity and reliability. The reliability of internal consistency correlation α =.97 0, and split-half correlation γ (subscript xx) = .935. The validity of GLCS showed a 8-factors structure by factor analysis, and that were competence of Change and Action Facilitating, Cohesion Facilitating, Group Depth Enhancing, Process Leading & Facilitating, Individual Depth Enhancing, Norm Building, Process Obstacle Breaking through, and Terminating & Change Intensifying. Furthermore, Pearson's correlation with the ”Professional Ability Scale for Group Counseling Leader” γ = .697. Based on those well acceptable evidences for the validity and reliability of the instrument, its advanced application in practice and research were discussed and recommended.

並列摘要


The study was aimed at developing an instrument for measuring trainees' competencies in leading counseling and psychotherapy groups. Foundation of the original 60 items of Group Leadership Competence Scale (GLCS) were proposed mainly based on group theory, researchers' previous research findings, group counselor training practices, and literature reviews. After evaluated by six professionals for content validity, three items CVI lower than .70 were deleted and two similar items were integrated into one, then the version of remaining 56 items were used. 258 valid samples were gathered for analyzing the critical ratio and test their internal consistency. 7 items were deleted and only 49 items were left for examining the validity and reliability. The reliability of internal consistency correlation α =.97 0, and split-half correlation γ (subscript xx) = .935. The validity of GLCS showed a 8-factors structure by factor analysis, and that were competence of Change and Action Facilitating, Cohesion Facilitating, Group Depth Enhancing, Process Leading & Facilitating, Individual Depth Enhancing, Norm Building, Process Obstacle Breaking through, and Terminating & Change Intensifying. Furthermore, Pearson's correlation with the ”Professional Ability Scale for Group Counseling Leader” γ = .697. Based on those well acceptable evidences for the validity and reliability of the instrument, its advanced application in practice and research were discussed and recommended.

參考文獻


吳秀碧(2010)。系統化訓練模式對諮商團體領導者進階訓練效果之研究。中華輔導與諮商學報。28,101-146。
許育光、吳秀碧(2010)。諮商團體領導者於情緒處理段落之介入策略研究。中華輔導與諮商學報。27,245-284。
吳秀碧(2005)。諮商團體領導原理的建構:螺旋式領導方法。中華輔導學報。17,1-32。
吳秀碧、許育光、洪雅鳳、羅家玲(2004)。非結構諮商團體過程中領導者技術應用之研究。中華心理衛生學刊。17(3),49-82。
許育光(2009)。碩士層級受訓團體諮商師參與「螺旋式領導取向」培訓之成效與介入能力學習經驗分析。教育心理學報。41,323-346。

被引用紀錄


許育光、刑志彬(2021)。新手團體諮商師領導能力發展探究:歷程追蹤、分項比較與學習類型叢集分析教育心理學報53(1),1-36。https://doi.org/10.6251/BEP.202109_53(1).0001
林家興、林旻沛、黃佩娟、胡薇瑄、江信男(2015)。心理師能力評量表之編製及其信效度分析教育心理學報47(1),63-86。https://doi.org/10.6251/BEP.20141008
王金永、盧惠芬、黃韻如(2024)。精神科社工人員臨床團體工作實務現況與能力研究中華心理衛生學刊37(1),19-51。https://doi.org/10.30074/FJMH.202403_37(1).0002
買詠婕、許育光、刑志彬(2019)。多軸向自我傷害危機處理能力評量之工具建構中華心理衛生學刊32(3),295-327。https://doi.org/10.30074/FJMH.201909_32(3).0004
吳聖雅(2023)。新手團體領導者帶領大學生諮商團體之省思-以自信提升團體為例輔導季刊59(2),83-92。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=19966822-N202307130007-00007

延伸閱讀