- 期刊
社區性侵害犯多層面性調查表評估
Survey of Community Sex Offenders' Using the Multiphasic Sex Inventory
摘要
目的：本文探討臺北地區性侵害犯罪加害人在「多層面性調查表」中表現出所有性侵害犯的共同特性、不同性侵害犯的獨特特性與所有性侵害犯共同的欺騙特性;並藉3~4週重測瞭解「多層面性查表」之穩定性。方法：以二十名正在接受治療或者準備接受治療的臺北地區社區性侵害犯為樣本，包括十名戀童癖、七名強暴犯、兩名猥褻犯以及一名暴露癖，實施多層面性調查表前測與後測，兩次測量之間間隔三到四週。結果：戀童癖與強暴犯侵害者在性偏差量表中的戀童量表上得分均達到顯著，具有某方面偏差的特性。而所有侵害犯在不典型性行為、性功能失常、性知識量表上的表現不同。在所有性侵害犯共同的欺騙特性上，說謊量表上皆表現出「不誠實」，81%的侵害犯呈現出認知扭曲或不成熟，33.3%的侵害犯會找尋正當化的藉口，47.6%的侵害犯是沒有動機接受治療的。結論：本研究發現性侵害者在「多層面性調查表」表現的共同特性與差異性型態的部份結果，間隔3~4週的前後測之再測信度在0.24到0.93之間，具有一定的穩定性。未來可進一步運用於更多性侵害犯身上，以了解臺灣各種性侵害犯的反應型態。
並列摘要
Background and Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the common characteristics of all sex offenders, the unique characteristics of a range of different sex offenders, and the common deceptive characteristics of all sex offenders from the Taipei area using the Multiphasic Sex Inventory. A retest was undertaken three to four weeks later to measure the stability of the MSI results. Methods: The sample was made up of twenty community sex offenders from the Taipei area who were undergoing treatment or ready to undergo treatment. They included ten child molesters, seven rapists, two persons convicted of obscene publication offenses and one exhibitionist/flasher. These sex offenders were subjected to a test and retest using the Multiphasic Sex Inventory. The interval between the two tests was between three and four weeks. Results: The scores for the child molesters and the rapists showed notable differences for the child molestation and rape scales, which form part of the sexual deviance domain, and showed aberration from the norm in other aspects. All offenders showed variation in terms of atypical sexual outlets, sexual dysfunction and sexual knowledge scales. The lie scales showed all those tested to be dishonest and there were common deceptive characteristics to all the sex offenders. Overall, 81% of the sex offenders were cognitively distorted and immature and, in addition, 33.3% of the offenders tried to justify their offending behavior. Finally, 47.6% of the offenders showed no motivation to accept treatment. Conclusion: This study identifies the common characteristics and the various differences among sex offenders. The results show a degree of stability because the test-retest reliability was between 0.24 and 0.93 for these subjects. If this approach is applied to more sex offenders in the future, it will be possible to understand in more detail the range of sex offenders found in Taiwan.