本研究的主要目的在探討國民中小學教師進修學分學位後,在學校中所表現的效能,是否得到學校教職員的肯定。採用「國中、國小教師進修學分學位效能評定量表」為研究工具,以二階段隨機叢集抽樣方法,抽取彰化縣國民中小學教師513人作為研究對象,進行進修效能評定,結果發現:一、國民中小學教師進修學分學位後,在「對組織績效之貢獻」、「個人效能之提昇」以及「整體表現之效能」卓著,受到全體教職員之極大肯定。二、無論服務學校類別、教師之性別、教師職分、教師年齡層、教師之學歷與所進修學分學位之層級,均一致肯定教師進修之效能卓著。三、不同類別學校、不同性別、不同年齡層之教師,對進修效能評定之差異不顯著。四、兼任行政教師比一般職員顯著肯定進修效能;碩士學位教師與學士學位教師對進修效能評定之差異達顯著水準、;進修獲得碩士學位教師,比進修獲得學士學位教師更肯定進修效能,其評定結果之差異顯著。五、曾經在職進修教師比未曾在職進修教師,對進修效能更加肯定,其評定結果有顯著差異。
The purpose of this study was to ascertain the performance of junior high and primary school teachers, after receiving inservice education (either credential or diplomatic), were they perceived as successful by fellow faculties and staffs. The study used ”Junior High School & Primary School Inservice Education Effectiveness Rating Scale” as an evaluation tool. The ”Two-Stage Random Cluster Sampling” method is being applied to the study. Total 513 subjects were chosen from junior high and primary school teachers located in Changhua County, their inservice education effectiveness has been evaluated. Findings are as follows: 1. After receiving inservice education, the teachers' were approved of their performance on ”contribution to organizational achievements”, ”increase of individul effectiveness”, and ”overall performance effectiveness”. 2. Factors such as school type, gender, mastership, teachers' age level, education and type of inservice education attended, all approved the effectiveness of receiving the inservice education by faculties and staffs. 3. There was no significant difference between school type, and teachers' age level toward the inservice education effectiveness evaluation. 4. Significant approval of inservice education effectiveness was shown by teachers who hold concurrent administrative positions. There was significant difference between teachers with a master's degree and those with a bachelor's degree. Teachers who received their master's degree through inservice education have shown more agreement toward the effectiveness of the education. 5. There was significant difference between teachers who received inservice education and those who did not; those who received inservice education shown more agreement toward its effectiveness.