透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.21.34.0
  • 期刊

中小學教師專業發展評鑑方案之影響評估

Impact Assessment on the Program of Teacher Evaluation for Professional Development

摘要


本研究以中小學教師專業發展評鑑試辦方案為客體,運用統計控制及理論導向評鑑(theory-driven evaluation)進行方案影響評估(impact assessment)。針對全國參與試辦之高中職與國民中小學行政人員與教師進行問卷調查,並以方案要素(支持系統、方案活動)及方案成果進行資料分析。結果顯示,在支持系統與方案活動的介入要素中,宣導溝通落實情形優於教師研討與自評、教師他評與成長、及諮詢輔導,而在方案成果上,以教師教學能力提升之成果最顯著,其次是評鑑認知的增進、及學校生態的改變。此外,為確認方案介入所產生之影響,首以統計控制將支持系統與方案活動依落實程度分為高、中、低三組,結果得到三組之方案成果具顯著差異;次以理論導向評鑑方法進行檢視,發現支持系統與方案活動對於方案成果,皆具顯著之解釋力。總結本研究之實施,一方面呈現了有別於傳統實驗設計的影響評估方法,另一方面則提供了具體數據,指陳需要有效落實以達成教師專業發展評鑑目標的方案要素。

並列摘要


Using the pilot program of teacher evaluation for professional development (TEPD) as an object, this study employed statistical control technique and theory-driven evaluation to assess the program impact. Administrators and teachers in primary and secondary schools attending the program were surveyed. Program components, including program supporting system and program activities, as well as program outcome, were covered in the data analysis. It was found that ”training and communication” was the highly implemented program component, better than the other three components: ”teacher discussions and self-assessment,” ”peer assessment and teacher growth,” and ”consultation and guidance.” And the enhancement of teaching was the most obvious outcome observed, the score of which was higher than the advancement of evaluation cognition and the change of school ecology. In addition, in order to examine the program impact, three groups reflecting different degrees of program implementation were classified firstly using statistical control technique. Significant differences of program outcomes were found among the three groups. Secondly, it was revealed from the theory-driven evaluation analysis that both the supporting system and program activities significantly predicted program effects. In conclusion, this study not only used a new method of impact assessment distinguishing its features from the traditional experimental design but also identified the program components which are essential to effectively achieve the goal of TEPD program.

參考文獻


吳明隆(2003)。SPSS統計應用學習實務。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:知城數位=Book city。
吳金香、陳世穎(2008)。國小教師對試辦教師專業發展評鑑態度之調查研究:以臺中縣市為例。學校行政。53,211-253。
呂仁禮(2009)。教師專業發展評鑑試辦成效之研究:以一所國民中學為例。學校行政。63,131-153。
周麗華(2010)。臺北市國小教師專業發展評鑑實施效應之研究。市北教育學刊。37,103-125。
邱皓政(2000)。量化研究與統計分析。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:五南=Wunan。

被引用紀錄


羅珮瑜(2007)。臺北縣國民中學教師專業發展評鑑之個案研究〔碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0021-0204200815534655
黃嘉翎(2015)。教師專業發展評鑑對教師專業發展影響之研究- 以台南市後壁區國小教師為例〔碩士論文,國立中正大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0033-2110201614012881
羅士杰(2015)。學校文化與教師專業發展評鑑態度之研究〔碩士論文,國立中正大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0033-2110201614041904

延伸閱讀