並列摘要
Australia is one of the last developed nations to put in place universal paid maternity leave provisions. The International Labor Organization (ILO), via the Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission (HREOC), has made a recommendation for minimum provisions, on which the Australian Government has not yet acted. The reasons for the lack of action with relation to this issue include cost-based arguments, political reasons, and the larger issue of women not being regarded as participants in the labor force whose interests are equal to those of their male counterparts. This paper explores the concept of a paid maternity leave scheme in Australia, and the arguments for and against the adoption of a scheme such as that proposed by HREOC.
延伸閱讀
- 方婷玉（2010）。我國育嬰留職停薪津貼政策之探討：以台北縣市女性申請者為例〔碩士論文，國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2010.02716
- 張菊惠（1998）。質性研究在澳洲：女性主義觀點批判公共衛生知識權力的分配。婦女與兩性研究通訊，(49)，21-22。https://doi.org/10.6256/FWGS.1998.49.21
- Hughes, M., & Carlsen, J. (2011). 澳大利亞國家公園使用者付費系統：成本回收對上完全開放. 觀光休閒學報, 17(2), 129-146. https://doi.org/10.6267/JTLS.2011.17(2)2
- Yeh, C. W. (2019). 婦女申請育嬰留職停薪對於產後職涯之影響 [master's thesis, National Taiwan University]. Airiti Library. https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU201902918
- 李政儒、王瓊琳（2023）。以國際婦女健康保護公約探討我國勞動產假之展望。工業安全衛生，(407)，3-20。https://doi.org/10.6311/ISHM.202305_(407).0003