透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.12.71.237
  • 期刊
  • OpenAccess

Democratization and State Capacity in East and Southeast Asia

並列摘要


This essay surveys the development of democracy in seven East and Southeast Asian states and its impacts on state capacity. The states covered are: South Korea, Taiwan, Thailand, Indonesia, the Philippines, Malaysia, and Singapore. In the first five of these states, democratic structures have been introduced only over the last two decades. In the last two, they remain profoundly constrained. The essay considers the impacts of this development on state capacity. State capacity is a complex variable. It can be subdivided into three primary components: political, policy, and organizational capacities. Within each of these components, specific elements that have been affected by, or that potentially gain new significance from, democratization are examined. Political capacity involves political culture, political parties, the formation of executives, and executive-legislative relations. Policy capacity entails the assimilation of new policy strategies. Administrative capacity involves bureaucratic politicization and interest aggregation. The essay concludes that state capacity in all seven countries draws mostly on old foundations. Democracy has introduced new forms and new dynamic elements. However, its consolidation is a work in progress. For the moment, democratic forms constitute primarily a varnish, beneath which older patterns of power and authority continue to flourish.

並列關鍵字

無資料

參考文獻


Ian Marsh (ed.)(2006).Governance and Regionalism in East and Southeast Asia.London:Routledge.
Robert Wade(1990).Governing the Market: Economic Theory and the Role of Government in East Asian Industrialization.Princeton:Princeton University Press.
Linda Weiss, (ed.)(2003).States in the Global Economy.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
Peter Evans(1995).Embedded Autonomy, States and Industrial Transformation.Princeton:Princeton University Press.
Martin Painter,Jon Pierre, (eds.)(2005).Challenges to State Policy Capacity: Global Trends and Comparative Perspective.Basingstoke:Palgrave Macmillan.

被引用紀錄


陳科銓(2011)。上海推動成為國際金融中心的可行性研究〔碩士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2011.00553
湯晏甄(2014)。東亞民眾的制度不信任感及其政治回應行為〔博士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2014.00134

延伸閱讀