Mexico provides significant insight into the modern challenges being faced by young democracies struggling to shed the remnants of their authoritarian past. Following some classic definitions from democratic theory, the country is best categorized as an electoral democracy striving to become a liberal one. Under such framework, this essay aims to analyze some of the enduring obstacles to Mexico's democratic consolidation, along with possible ways forward. Based on recent elections, this essay studies two problems that have been remarkably lasting: vote buying and vote coercion. Interestingly, these problems are more acute at the subnational level than they are at the national level, which compels us to revise some of the classic definitions of democracy in the theoretical literature. In particular, I propose a requirement for a country to be considered a liberal democracy instead of an electoral one: democratization must have disseminated to regions beyond the center, as well as to subnational levels beyond the national government. This conceptual discussion helps to frame the type of weaknesses still found in Mexico's democracy. I show that vote buying and vote coercion remain deeply entrenched in the political culture of several states that have fallen behind in their democracy levels, such as Veracruz. In assessing possible solutions to such problems, I describe the profound political reform of 2014 creating the National Electoral Institute (INE), which took the administration of local elections away from local governments. The results of the midterm elections of June 2015 allow concluding that this reform fell short of solving the enduring weaknesses of Mexico’s democracy. Rather, I suggest that Mexico needs actual regime change at the subnational level. Only then might the country transition from electoral democracy to liberal democracy.
為了持續優化網站功能與使用者體驗,本網站將Cookies分析技術用於網站營運、分析和個人化服務之目的。
若您繼續瀏覽本網站,即表示您同意本網站使用Cookies。