游泳1,500公尺自由式間段時間分析

An Analysis by Split Time for Championships of 1,500-Meter-Freestyle Swimming

陳福財(Fu-Tsai Chen) ； 陳奕良(Yi-Liang Chen) ； 陳堅錐(Chien-Chui Chen)

《運動教練科學》 9期 (2007/12) Pp. 153-164

https://doi.org/10.6194/SCS.2007.09.15

摘要

Purpose: This research explores the records of male swimming players based on split time. The raw data of the research are offered by the best eight players in playoffs of national championships for male 1,500-meter-freestyle swimming. Methods: There are three significant contests as sampling in the research, such as the Worldwide Swimming Championships (hereafter as WSC) in 2005, the National Inter-Universities Championships for Professional group (hereafter as NIUCP) in 2006 and the National Inter High Schools Championships (hereafter as NIHSC) in 2006 etc... The dimensions for our comparison are 100-meter split time and the sum of total records. We observe what changes in split distribution of every 100 meters by ways of ANOVA, stepwise regression analysis and posterior test. Results: The best way for players of 1,500-meter-freestyle swimming is the pace by average velocity. In views of the average performance, the best part is resulted from the WSC; the second best from the senior set of NIHSC; the third from the junior set of NIHSC and the worst from NIUCP. However, if contesting by grouping of aged intervals, the research analyses all the diversity factors by each 100-meter record. It is obviously different that the average of the value p shows less than 0.01. Therefore, distributing velocity averagely is the best pace based on a post-analysis in the research. The records from the 1,500-meter-freestyle item in the 2005 WSC shows such evidences. Conclusion: The average of the former eight players is as below, the WSC is 897.98(14:57.98) seconds, the NIUCP is 1066.43(17:46.43) seconds and the junior set of NISC is 1037.19 (17:17.19) seconds and the senior set of NIHSC is 1018.70 (16:58.70) seconds. In predicting total scoring, the research taking stepwise regression function reveals the 7(superscript th) interval in the WSC as the best and reaches the 90.3% of explicative quantity. The rest are as listed, the 2(superscript nd), the 14(superscript th) and the 5(superscript th), their explicative quantity are respectively as 5.4%, 2.0% and 1.3%. All the total explicative capability reaches 90%.

關鍵字

間段時間 ； 變異數分析 ； 事後比較 ； 逐步回歸分析

並列摘要

Purpose: This research explores the records of male swimming players based on split time. The raw data of the research are offered by the best eight players in playoffs of national championships for male 1,500-meter-freestyle swimming. Methods: There are three significant contests as sampling in the research, such as the Worldwide Swimming Championships (hereafter as WSC) in 2005, the National Inter-Universities Championships for Professional group (hereafter as NIUCP) in 2006 and the National Inter High Schools Championships (hereafter as NIHSC) in 2006 etc... The dimensions for our comparison are 100-meter split time and the sum of total records. We observe what changes in split distribution of every 100 meters by ways of ANOVA, stepwise regression analysis and posterior test. Results: The best way for players of 1,500-meter-freestyle swimming is the pace by average velocity. In views of the average performance, the best part is resulted from the WSC; the second best from the senior set of NIHSC; the third from the junior set of NIHSC and the worst from NIUCP. However, if contesting by grouping of aged intervals, the research analyses all the diversity factors by each 100-meter record. It is obviously different that the average of the value p shows less than 0.01. Therefore, distributing velocity averagely is the best pace based on a post-analysis in the research. The records from the 1,500-meter-freestyle item in the 2005 WSC shows such evidences. Conclusion: The average of the former eight players is as below, the WSC is 897.98(14:57.98) seconds, the NIUCP is 1066.43(17:46.43) seconds and the junior set of NISC is 1037.19 (17:17.19) seconds and the senior set of NIHSC is 1018.70 (16:58.70) seconds. In predicting total scoring, the research taking stepwise regression function reveals the 7(superscript th) interval in the WSC as the best and reaches the 90.3% of explicative quantity. The rest are as listed, the 2(superscript nd), the 14(superscript th) and the 5(superscript th), their explicative quantity are respectively as 5.4%, 2.0% and 1.3%. All the total explicative capability reaches 90%.

並列關鍵字

Split Time ； ANOVA ； Posterior Test ； Stepwise Regression Analysis

參考文獻

許安東。競賽游泳配時計劃分析、預測和配時表擬定之研究。駿馬出版社。

許樹淵(2000)。2000世界盃游泳賽女子800公尺自由式間段時間分析。中華體育。14(1)，58-62。

Mathews, D. K.,Bowers, R.,Fox, E.,Wilgus, W.(1963).Aerobic and Anaerobic Work Efficiency.Research Quarterly.34,356-360.