小學桌球訓練經驗對於自我效能、運動動機與運動行為之影響

Influence of Training Experience on Self-Efficacy, Motivation, and Behavior towards Sports Activity

黃俊發(Chun-Fa Huang)

《運動教練科學》 11期 (2008/09) Pp. 1-11

https://doi.org/10.6194/SCS.2008.11.01

摘要

本研究之目的：（一）探討有無小學訓練經驗者在運動自我效能、運動動機及運動行爲之差異；（二）探討運動自我效能對運動動機及運動行爲之預測。本研究之受試對象爲參加2005年大專運動會之乙組桌球選手330人，平均年齡爲21.33±3.56歲。所有受試者均填寫運動自我效能量表、運動動機量表、滿足感量表、退出意圖量表及運動行爲調查表。統計方法爲獨立樣本t考驗、皮爾遜積差相關與多元同時迴歸。研究結果顯示：有無小學訓練經驗者在運動自我效能與運動行爲有顯著差異存在。有小學訓練經驗者之運動自我效能可以正向預測運動動機與滿足感，並負向預測退出意圖；運動動機與滿足感均可負向預測退出意圖。經由徑路分析圖可知自我效能除可直接影響退出意圖外，亦可間接透過運動動機與滿足感影響退出意圖。

關鍵字

自我決定理論 ； 桌球選手

並列摘要

The current study investigated 1) the effect of training experience on self-efficacy, motivation, and behavior towards sports activity; 2) prediction using self-efficacy towards motivation and behavior towards sports activity. There were 330 table tennis athletes in 1996 National Athletic Competition participated this study. All participants self-efficacy scale, sport motivation scale, satisfaction scale, dropout intention scale, and sports behavior scale were recorded. Mean differences were compared by student t test. Correlation and multiple regressions were also determined for the pool sample. The result shows that the significant correlation between self-efficacy and sports behavior was dependent on their previous training on sports skill. For the individuals with training experience, sports satisfaction and motivation could be predicted by self-efficacy. Path analysis reveals that self-efficacy could influence withdraw intent, mediated by motivation and satisfaction.

並列關鍵字

self-determination theory ； table tennis player

參考文獻

林季燕、季力康(2003)。運動動機量表編制－信度與效度分析。台灣運動心理學報。2，15-32。

張志成(2006)。應用社會認知變項檢視六個月運動行為階段的改變。體育學報。40(3)，63-76。

邱啟潤、柯任桂(2000)。健康相關的飲食與運動行為自我效能量表信度效度之評估。護理研究。8(3)，301-312。

Adam, J.,White, M.(2004).Are active promotion interventions based on the transtheoretical model effective? A critical review.British Journal of sport Medicine.37,106-114.

Bandura, A.(1977).Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change.Psychological Review.84(2),191-215.