透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.119.143.4
  • 期刊

國民小學教師作文教學思考之個案研究

A Case Study of Primary School Teacher's Writing Teaching Thinking

摘要


本研究主要在探討國民小學教師作文教學之思考與做決定之情形。以訪談、非參與觀察等方法蒐集資料,藉以了解教師在作文教學前、中、後,是如何思考及做決定的。透過觀察老師與班級學生互動之情形以及與研究對象的對話與省思,明瞭資深專家教師在進行作文教學時之做決定歷程與其思考脈絡,期對實際從事作文教學之老師提供明確的作文教學參考。其研究結果如下:一、叮叮老師在作文教學前,以學生的經驗與能力作為決定其教學計畫內容之首要依據。二、叮叮老師在作文教學中(一)其思考主要集中在將教學計畫付諸實行;(二)整個作文教學過程,主要以教師個人心目中理想的作文架構(專業知識)來決定。三、叮叮老師在作文教學後,思考與做決定情形(一)教師反省思考的線索在上課中是以學生上課的反應及教師自己本身當下上課的情況;課後是以學生的文章、學生的回饋單及家長的反應。(二)作文批改決定方面,以教師個人的專業知識與語文能力,對文章進行修正及建議。最後,根據研究結果提出對教師作文教學實務與未來研究之建議。

並列摘要


The purposes of this study were to explore the process of a primary school teacher writing teaching and making decisions. The data were collected by means of interviews and nonparticipant observations to analyze and understand the teachers' teaching and made decisions in writing. By observing the interaction between teacher and students, making reflection and dialog with teacher, the researcher hoped that the findings can be used as references for writing teaching practice. The conclusions of this study were as following: 1. Before class, students' experiences and abilities were the most important basis for Din Din teacher to decide the content of teaching plan. 2. During the class. (1) Din Din teacher's thinking mainly concentrated on the plan implementing. (2) Din Din teacher's made decisions of whole teaching process mainly according to his individual writing structure (professional knowledge). 3. After class. (1) During the class, Din Din teacher's introspection clues were according to the students responses, teacher himself attended class immediately situation. After the class, Din Din teacher's introspection clues were by students' articles, students' feedback lists, and parents' responses. (2) The revisions and the suggestions of the articles were decided by Din Din teacher's individual specialized knowledge and the linguistic ability.

參考文獻


Berliner, D. C.(1988).The development of expertise in pedagogy.New Orleans:American Association of College for Teacher Education.
Borko, H.,Livingston, C.(1989).Cognition and improvisation: Differences in mathematics instruction by expert and novice teachers.American Educational Research Journal.26(4),473-498.
Jackson, P. W.(1990).Life in classroom.New York:Teacher College, Columbia University.
Morine-Dershimer, G.(1978).Planning and Classroom reality: An In-Depth Look.Educational Research Quarterly.3(4),83-99.
Peterson, P. L.(ed.),Walberg, H. J.(ed.)(1979).Research on teaching: Concepts, findings, and implications.Berkeley, CA:McCuthan.

被引用紀錄


劉盛佑(2008)。台北縣國民小學教師教學信念取向與教育政策執行效能認知之研究〔碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0021-0804200910261666
彭惠君(2010)。攜手計畫-課後扶助班的教學實踐-我與弱勢學生的教與學〔碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0021-1610201315181985
陳恆楨(2013)。一所學校推動仿寫作文教學發展的歷程分析〔碩士論文,國立中正大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0033-2110201613543325

延伸閱讀