代理理論控制觀點之知識評價模式初探

An Exploration of Knowledge Valuation: Agency Theory Controlling Perspective

李俊賢(Chun-Hsien Lee) ； 黃芳銘(Fang-Ming Hwang)

《管理實務與理論研究》 2卷2期 (2008/06) Pp. 121-138

https://doi.org/10.29916/JMPP.200806.0007

摘要

科技文明的發達來自於知識的累積，所引發的創新價值更是難以估計，在知識創價過程中，如何從事知識評價也日益重要。本文以代理理論控制觀點提出「知識擴散過程變異性」與「知識應用結果可分辨性」兩構面，並由Input-Process-Output (IPO)探討知識從投入、過程、產出三個不同觀點的評價方法。當「知識擴散過程變異性」與「知識應用結果可分辨性」兩者皆低時，適合以「程序」觀點評價知識；當「知識擴散過程變異性」高、「知識應用結果可分辨性」低時，適合以「投入」觀點評價知識；當「知識擴散過程變異性」低、「知識應用結果可分辨性」高時，適合以「產出」觀點評價知識。本文並就此三種知識評價觀點，提出相關方法與思維，希望藉此提供實務界與學術界對於知識評價此一主題之後續發展參考。

關鍵字

知識評價 ； 代理理論 ； 知識管理

並列摘要

This article presents the exploratory knowledge valuation framework. Two dimensions developing from the agency theory is ”knowledge diffusion variation” and ”knowledge implication identification”; in addition, adopting Input-Process-Output concept to discuss the valuation approach. When ”knowledge diffusion variation” and ”knowledge implication identification” are both low, we could evaluate knowledge in process perspective. When high in ”knowledge diffusion variation” and low in ”knowledge implication identification”, we could evaluate knowledge through input perspective. When low in ”knowledge diffusion variation” and high in “knowledge implication identification”, we could evaluate knowledge by output perspective.

並列關鍵字

knowledge valuation ； agency theory ； knowledge management

參考文獻

Barney, J. B.(1991).Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage.Journal of Management.17(1),99-120.

Brooking, A.(1991).Corporate memory.Thomson Business Press.

Clare, M.,Detore, A. W.(2000).Knowledge assets: Professional's guide to valuation and financial management.Harcourt Press.

Demski J.,Feltham G.(1978).Economic incentives in budgetary control systems.Accounting Review.53,336-359.

Dvavenport, T. H.,Prusak, L.(2000).Working knowledge.Harvard Business Press.