透過您的圖書館登入
IP:13.59.218.147
  • 期刊

Policy and Implementation of Undergraduate Student Learning Assessment: A Case Analysis of University M

摘要


Establishing policies to assure quality has become a top priority for institutions of higher education. In order to ensure the quality of learning, universities normally set up a learning assessment policy which provide academic staff with regulations or guidelines on quality assurance in learning assessment. However, it is vital that the policy of learning assessment should be in line with the core principles of learning assessment. Issues of how the policy will be communicated, promoted, perceived and implemented are also important issues. This study takes University M as a case study of learning assessment policy, making use of interviews with staff and document analysis. Twenty-two faculty members have been interviewed. The interview questions consisted of questions such as what the faculty members know about the policy, how they perceive and implement it, as well as the suggestions they provide. The documents that are analyzed were obtained from University M's website and the Registry. The findings show that University M has established policies and guidelines on the implementation of assessment of learning but only four regulations directly link to learning assessment. Findings also show that the policy appeared to consider more about administrative management, and the purpose of assessment is summative orientated. It is suggested that the formulation of a learning assessment policy should take the learning goals of the institution, the nature of learning and the views and issues of teachers, into account.

參考文獻


American Association for Higher Education. (1996). Principles of good practice for assessing student learning. Retrieved January 4, 2017, from http://www.learningoutcomesassessment.org/PrinciplesofAssessment.html
Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2007). Aligning assessment with intended learning outcomes: Principles. In J. Biggs & C. Tang (Eds.), Teaching for quality learning at university: What the student does (3rd ed., pp. 163-194). Maidenhead, UK: McGraw-Hill, Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.
Boud, D. (2000). Sustainable assessment: Rethinking assessment for the learning society. Studies in Continuing Education, 22(2), 151-167.
D’Andrea, V.-M. (2007). Improving teaching and learning in higher education: Can learning theory add value to quality reviews? In D. F. Westerheijden, B. Stensaker, & M. J. Rosa (Eds.), Quality assurance in higher education: Trends in regulation, translation and transformation (pp. 209-223). Dordrecht, The Netherland: Springer.
Erwin, T. D., & Knight, P. (1995). A transatlantic view of assessment and quality in higher education. Quality in Higher Education, 1(2), 179-188.

被引用紀錄


程建彰(1999)。含硫三鐵錯合物 [SFe3(CO)9]2- 的化性研究與新系列 15 族-鉻錯合物的合成開發與相關反應探討〔博士論文,國立臺灣師範大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0021-1804200713485130
郭可欣(2000)。含主族第十五族(銻、鉍)之混合過渡金屬(鉬、錳、鐵)團簇化合物之合成與系統性研究〔碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0021-1804200716004552
陳榮倉(2000)。含銻、鉍之鐵羰基化合物和鉛之鉻羰基化合物其合成、結構與反應性研究〔碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0021-1804200715595247
陳鴻文(2003)。含第16族元素(S、Se、Te)之過渡金屬(Mn、Fe、Ru)團簇化合物的合成與其化性、物性的研究〔碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0021-2603200719133125

延伸閱讀