並列摘要
Kepler and Galileo are well-known as two of the few Copernicans that promoted the notion of heliostatic astronomy in the early Seventeenth century. Kepler endorsed Galileo's new discoveries made through the telescope and was eager to establish a relationship with Galileo. But contrary to every reasonable expectation, Galileo always remained aloof from Kepler and never accepted Kepler's laws of planetary motion and his tidal theory. For a long time, this has been ”a maddening puzzle in the history of science”. There are many historical explanations as to why Galileo did not credit Kepler. This paper attempts to appraise the known interpretations and provide an alternative explanation for the mysterious and distant relationship between Kepler and Galileo. The alternative can be a supplement to other explanations. It also shows that the two Copernicans had their own ways of philosophizing, especially in their concept of the causation of motion, which led to Galileo never appreciating Kepler's scientific notions.
參考文獻
延伸閱讀
- 戴東源（2007）。克普勒之前的天文思想演變：哥白尼與第谷。科技醫療與社會，(5)，111-182。https://doi.org/10.6464/TJSSTM.200710.0111
- Tseng, Y. Y. (2014). 伽羅瓦理論 [master's thesis, National Central University]. Airiti Library. https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0031-0605201417535201
- 林美綺（2012）。瑜伽應用於暴食症的成效探討。諮商與輔導，(324)，6-10。https://doi.org/10.29837/CG.201212.0004
- 林俊育（2000）。安德烈•波伽利的心路歷程。新使者，(61)，55-56。https://doi.org/10.29949/TNM.200012.0018
- Chien, Y. R., & Chen, P. Y. (2018). Impact of Jamming Attack on Galileo Receivers. 電腦學刊, 29(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.3966/199115992018012901001