透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.118.1.232
  • 期刊

國民黨的原住民選舉動員:一個社會文化互動途徑的初探分析

Indigenous Electoral Mobilization of the Kuomintang: A Preliminary Analysis of the Socio-Cultural Approach

摘要


我國選舉制度保障原住民特別席次,其選區劃分係以身分而非戶籍地區分。因此,原住民選民的遷徙,至少就立委選舉層級而言,並不影響其投票權。然而,原住民立委選舉的地理選區仍為全國範圍,就選民分散程度來說,原住民選區遠高過區域選區。在這樣的情形下,過往聚焦於區域選舉而得出的選舉動員相關研究發現,恐未能同樣適用於解釋原住民選舉。不過,社會文化互動理論指出,新遷徙的移民會在建構新身份認同時,會經由雙向定位與歸屬認同的過程中找到新的地位、身分,以及新的「關係模式」,繼而在原生及新社群間建構連結,並相互影響。這種從社會文化互動理論出發的觀點,提供給我們探索現有政治系絡下原住民選舉動員模式的新視角。有鑒於台灣原住民本有強烈之原生社群互動趨勢,在遷移的過程中,不僅大量依靠由原生社群所一起組織而成的新社群提供之社會及人際資源,甚至更進一步利用新社群所建構出之關係與原生社群連接出更緊密之人際資源網絡。因此,本研究擬運用質性研究模式,深度瞭解原住民社群互動的現象,並進一步討論社群互動與人際資源網絡在國民黨原住民選舉動員中所扮演的角色與發展。

並列摘要


In order to guarantee that the indigenous people have the voice out in Taiwan's domestic politics, the seats of the legislators are reserved / dedicated despite the regions they reside. As a result, indigenous people's internal immigration of the does not actually affect their voting rights in different residential areas. Since the indigenous voters are widely distributed and applied to a different electoral system, the existing literatures of electoral mobilization may not be able to provide objective information on the indigenous electoral behaviors. However, according to the social-cultural approach, when the new comers first moved to the new place to construct their identity in the metropolitan, the relational process happened. They interact with people from both the rooted and the new communities as their resources to keep/rebuild their identity/ies, and at the same time seek power in order to position themselves in both communities.The approach provides us a new viewpoint to explore the electoral mobilization among the indigenous groups. The indigenous people in Taiwan tend to keep strong connections with the rooted community. They not only rely on the new comer indigenous groups to get social and human recourses, but also use the new resource to create a two-way interactive model that further helps integrate the resources from both rooted and new communities. This qualitative study thus aims to explore the interactive patterns among the indigenous people and how the patterns play roles in indigenous electoral mobilization of the Kuomintang.

參考文獻


林金定、嚴嘉楓、陳美花(2005)。質性研究方法:訪談模式與實施步驟分析。身心障礙研究。3(2),122-136。
張佑宗、趙珮如(2006)。社會脈絡、個人網絡與台灣2004年立法委員選舉選民的投票抉擇。台灣民主季刊。3(2),1-38。
包正豪(2011)。原住民政治版圖的持續與變遷:1992-2008 立委選舉的總體資料分析。選舉研究。18(2),87-120。
盛杏湲(2002)。統獨議題與台灣選民的投票行為: 一九九Ο年代的分析。選舉研究。9(1),41-80。
張卿卿(2002)。競選媒體使用對選民競選議題知識與政治效能感的影響:以兩千年總統大選為例。選舉研究。9(1),1-39。

被引用紀錄


阮俊達(2015)。台灣原住民族運動的軌跡變遷(1983-2014)〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2015.01953
蕭喬薇(2014)。原住民社群如何經驗國家-仁愛鄉曲冰部落的公民實踐〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2014.01458
王德星(2016)。族群認同、競選模式與選舉動員:以嘉義縣阿里山鄉南三村村長選舉為例〔碩士論文,國立中正大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0033-2110201614060328

延伸閱讀